In the area of Afar in Hadar, Ethiopia, Australopithecus afarensis,
or 'southern ape of Afar', now possessed mixed human and chimpanzee
characteristics. They had small brains, long, dangly arms, short legs and
a cone-shaped thorax with a large belly. But the structure of their knees
and pelvis show that they routinely walked upright on two legs.
Probably descended from
Australopithecus anamensis, and just over a metre tall, afarensis foraged for fruit, nuts and seeds in
a mixture of savannah and woodland. They may also have obtained animal
protein from termites or bird's eggs.
The most famous afarensis remains discovered were those of
'Lucy' found by anthropologist Professor Donald Johanson and his student
Tom Gray in a maze of ravines at Hadar in northern Ethiopia in 1974, and
dated to 3.2 million years ago. The following year Michael Bush, one of
Johanson's students, found the remains of more than 13 afarensis
individuals buried together following a natural disaster – possibly a
flash flood. The find yielded vital information about afarensis'
social organisation, likening it to the social grouping found in
chimpanzees.
Professor Robin Crompton of Liverpool University has used computer
modelling to reconstruct how Lucy walked based on the proportions of her
skeleton. He assumed that Lucy could either have walked upright with a
bent hip and knees like a chimp, or with straight legs like a human.Orangutans live
20-40m above ground in the forests of Indonesia. They spend most of their
time in an upright position, but suspend themselves from branches with
their long arms. However, orangutans sometimes walk on branches without aid, raising
their arms for balance. Orangutans are not as closely related to humans as
chimps. But this behaviour was recently observed in wild chimpanzees
living in dense forest, suggesting it could be an ancestral trait common
to all great apes.
It is thought that the human lineage developed routine bipedalism as a
strategy for living on the ground when climate change decimated the
forest, leaving wide belts of open terrain with no trees. Crompton
believes the forest canopy bipedalism shown by orangutans provided the
kick-start for routine bipedalism when our ancestors came down from the
trees and began living on the ground. Once our ancestors were forced to
adapt to living on the ground, some drew on this behaviour from their
existing repertoire as a method of terrestrial locomotion.
The challenges of spending more time on the ground would have favoured
those hominids whose anatomy and behaviour gave them a reproductive edge
over their peers, however slight. Hominids that were good bipedal walkers
were clearly at an advantage in this terrestrial environment, because
millions of years later, humans walk on two legs instead of four.
Australopithecus afarensis
3.5 million
Australopithecus bahrelghazali appeared, and flourished until 3.0
million years ago.
The species designation of Australopithecus bahrelghazali is a
new one, which has little support at present among most researchers. This
is due to the small sample size, its recent designation, and the affinity
of the specimen to afarensis material. However, it differs in
several important aspects from afarensis (the geography being a
major component in and of itself), and thus may be a new species, or at
least a regional variation of afarensis.
The material designated as bahrelghazali was discovered by
Michel Brunet's team in the ancient riverbed of Bahr el Ghazal in Chad,
2,500 kilometres west of the Rift Valley. This was the furthest west
australopithecine material had been found in Africa.
No further specimens have been found so an impression of
bahrelghazali is not yet possible.
Australopithecus bahrelghazali
A much shorter-surviving species, Kenyanthropus
platyops appeared at the same time, but seems to have died out by 3.3
million years ago.
Discovered by Meave Leakey and her team in 1998 in the west of Lake
Turkana in Kenya (near the Ethiopian border), Kenyanthropus platyops was described as a new
genus dating back to the middle Pliocene period, positioning itself as a
possible direct ancestor of modern humans. However, the skull found was
very distorted, and some researchers believe this may not be a separate
species at all.
Australopithecus afarensis
continued to roam a mixed habitat of savannah
and woodland beside lakes and floodplains, foraging for fruit, seeds and
nuts and maybe even some meat. They probably climbed into trees to avoid
sabre-toothed cats like dinofelis and to sleep in safety at night.
This hominid seems to have lived in social groups of between 20 and
30. These groups were probably like those of chimpanzees, with dominance
hierarchies in which each individual knows their place. Male afarensis
probably cooperated to drive away predators. Once mature, females may have
joined other troops of afarensis.
Drying Earth
3.0 million
As Australopithecus afarensis and
bahrelghazali
disappeared, the first hominid to replace them was Australopithecus
africanus, a direct descendant of afarensis, which lasted until 2.4 million years ago.
The world of Lucy and Australopithecus afarensis had vanished.
Hidden forces were transforming the Earth's climate, with devastating
consequences for the African landscape. Temperatures in Africa plummeted
and the air became stripped of moisture. By 2.8 million years, humid
woodland had shrivelled away, leaving wide belts of open terrain in its
place.
The cause of this environmental upheaval was to be found in space. The
Earth orbits the Sun at a slight tilt, known as the axis of rotation. This
means that as our planet spins, it points towards the Sun at some times
and away from it at others. This is the origin of the seasons on Earth.
Three million years ago, this axis was changing so that the Earth pointed
away from the Sun for longer periods. This caused an overall cooling of
the Earth, locking away moisture in ice at the North and South Poles. It
also made the climate more seasonal, as Earth dried out.
In Africa, some animals that relied on the forests for their food died
out. But others evolved to exploit different dietary sources. For example,
many evolved physical adaptations to graze on the new species of plant
life called grass that colonised the
deforested terrain. Wildlife in Africa diversified as new animal species
evolved to exploit different sources of food in a new mosaic of
environments. The same seems to have happened to our ancestors, who had
previously relied on forest foods such as soft fruit. After three million
years, new ape-men were springing up all over the continent.
Australopithecus
africanus
2.7 million
Paranthropus aethiopicus, a species not directly related to
modern man, appeared in East Africa, and survived until 2.2 million years ago.
It was a short-lived side-shoot of
Australopithecus africanus,
and existed alongside it. This and subsequent robust species of
early human represented very different morphologies than were
seen in the known Australopithecus specimens.
Adaptations of the cranium were associated with a "heavy-chewing
complex." This complex is thought to have made it possible for these early
humans to eat large amounts of tough, fibrous foods. Another feature of
the robust skull is the presence, at least in males, of a prominent
sagittal crest, a bony ridge that runs along the length of the top of the
skull. This bony ridge provides an anchoring point for the large
temporalis muscles.
These unique adaptations led Robert Broom to place the robust early
humans from southern Africa into their own genus Paranthropus.
Several species names have been proposed, including P. robustus or
P. crassidens. In the 1960's palaeoanthropologists began to note
similarities between all of the early human species before the appearance
of Homo. As such, many researchers began to place all early human
species into a single genus (Australopithecus) and described each
species as either a "gracile" or "robust" Australopith. The robust
specimens from southern Africa were then placed in the species
Australopithecus robustus.
In recent years, many researchers have sought to emphasize the
uniqueness of the heavy-chewing adaptations seen in at least three
separate species of early human. Many favour the separation of these
species into a robust genus of early human, for which the name
Paranthropus was the first used, and therefore has seniority over all
other names.
The short-lived species Australopithecus garhi appeared,
descended either from afarensis or
africanus, it isn't clear
yet which.
Garhi discoveries were made at Bouri, in the Middle Awash area
of Ethiopia's Afar desert (about 70 kilometres south of the Lucy
afarensis discovery at Hadar). The area was verdant at this time, with
herds of antelope grazed the plains surrounding a lake. Volcanic ash and
lava are interbedded with the fossil-bearing strata, providing accurately
datable material. The ash just below the fossils erupted at this time.
The research team reported evidence of the earliest traces of animal
butchery at the same site. Antelopes had been butchered with the world's
earliest known stone tools. There is no direct evidence that garhi
used stone tools, but the proximal cut-marked bones provide circumstantial
evidence.
Garhi represents one of evolution's many question marks. It was
contemporary of africanus but had a smaller brain than africanus
and retained much of the primitive facial structure of afarensis.
Nevertheless, its mouth was more comparable to modern humans than
africanus. Researchers have long assumed that evolution occurs in a
linear fashion, with younger species possessing more "advanced" features
than older ones. Garhi complicates this assumption as it seems to
be a evolutionary step backward.
The specimens found include an associated set of cranial fragments,
frontal, parietals, and maxilla with dentition. Garhi's teeth were
larger than those of the earlier afarensis. Its braincase, face and
palate were more primitive than those of later Homo. The known
specimens demonstrate that the thigh bone had elongated a million years
before the Homo forearm shortened. The derived human-like
humeral/femoral ratio together with the ape-like upper arm-to-lower arm
ratio evidence the mosaic-like evolution of the features that characterize
modern humans.
Garhi was probably the direct ancestor of both Homo rudolfensis and Homo
habilis, but vitally, it is not yet certain if Homo rudolfensis was the ancestor
of later Homo species, or if Homo habilis was.
Australopithecus garhi
2.4 million
Homo rudolfensis ('Rudolf man') first appeared at this time, and
flourished until 1.6 million
years ago, living in East Africa.
Probably descended from Australopithecus garhi,
rudolfensis may have lived over a wide area of East Africa,
from Ethiopia in the north to Malawi in the south. It was a very tall
species,
towering above other hominids alive at the time – especially the stumpy
Homo habilis. Their faces were large and flat in comparison with those
of habilis, with flared cheekbones and big molar teeth, and their
brains were 56% the size of those of modern man.
Like the slightly later Homo habilis, rudolfensis probably combined
foraging with scavenging meat from animal carcasses. This probably placed the
two species in competition with each other. The large body size of
rudolfensis may have made it more effective at scaring away other
animals from kills, turning it into a better scavenger.
Both habilis and rudolfensis survived for approximately
300,000 years after the appearance of the species that replaced them, and
there is still some debate as to rudolfensis' exact
classification - and even whether it was really a species fully separate
from Homo habilis
-
but neither species was directly related to the other hominid type which
flourished at the time: Paranthropus boisei.