|
|
Celtic Kingdoms of the British Isles
Celts of Britain
|
|
|
|
|
Iceni
(Cenimagni?)
Made famous by their uprising against the
Romans,
the Iceni (or Eceni) were a Celtic tribe based in what is now Norfolk, north-western
Suffolk and eastern Cambridgeshire. They may also be identified with the tribe of the Cenimagni
('Ceni' or Iceni and 'magni', 'great'), who sided with Caesar during his
invasion of 54 BC, perhaps signalling the beginnings of the Iceni's
pro-Roman policy. Like their neighbours, they were
probably a Belgic tribe from the North Sea or Baltics, part of the third
wave of Celtic settlers in Britain.
The Iceni are linked to the La Téne period in Europe, thanks to the work of Hawkes
(1931) and Childe (1940), both of whom are cited by Jones (1997). He noted that
Childe interpreted the burials and stray objects regarded as characteristic of
the La Téne tradition in East Anglia as the culture of ‘Marnian Chieftains’ who
established control of the ‘Halstatt peasantry’ and later founded the Iceni tribe.
In the first century BC, the Wash, on their western border, may have had its
coast much further south than has been previously thought, in which case the
Catuvellauni territory may have
extended to that virtually uninhabited Fenland coast, dividing the Iceni
from their westerly Coritani neighbours.
To the south of the Iceni were the Trinovantes.
Edward Dawson points out that while the
Britons used the 'k'
pronunciation of the letter 'c', the Romans used a 'ch' sound, as did the
later Angles, Saxons
and Franks.
However, this 'k' sound would have been lost in East Anglia
due to Roman dominance there, affecting the later pronunciation of the names of towns or forts
containing the letter 'c'. Under later Germanic rule the Latin 'castra' became 'chester' everywhere, but in areas where
the wilder British tribes survived (to the west) the 'k' sound survived and the spelling became 'caster' instead in
many places. The Iceni would have used a 'ch' rather than a 'k' sound simply
because the inhabitants would have been far more Romanised than the western
Britons. Indeed, it is even possible that during the Roman period most
people in the south-east of what is now
England spoke mostly Latin instead of
Brythonic, due to far a far greater level of colonisation by Roman
citizens. This would have impinged on local pronunciations, making some
letter sounds more accessible for the invading Angles.
(Additional information by Edward Dawson, and from The Oxford History of England: Roman
Britain, Peter Salway.)
|
|
|
|
75 BC |
An
Iron Age road is constructed in timber, possibly part of a route across the
River Waveney and surrounding wetland at Geldeston in Norfolk. It is
investigated by archaeologists in June 2011 after being discovered the year
before, and is thought to have been built by the Iceni tribe. Tree-ring
samples date the find fairly confidently to this period. Thanks to its
wetland environment, the timber posts are preserved in remarkable detail,
still showing the signs of tool marks. The surviving section forms a four
metre wide (thirteen feet) route, running for five hundred metres across
wetland right up to the river.
 |
|
The remains of the Iceni road and its intact timber structures
were still being excavated in 2011 for the new series of the
BBC's Digging for Britain
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 BC |
The
second expedition by Julius Caesar from
Roman-occupied
Gaul sees him achieve more success than previously. In his battles against
the Catuvellauni he is
supported (or at least, not opposed) by a tribe known as the Cenimagi, probably
the Iceni of later years. The name can be translated as 'Great Iceni',
suggesting that the tribe at this time is much more powerful or has far
greater prestige than perhaps it does a century later. The reason why it
might enjoy greater prestige has been lost to prehistory. By this stage the
tribe may be minting its first gold and silver coins, although some sources
claim a later date of about 10 BC. |
|
|
|
fl c.AD 20s |
Can- |
Abbreviated name found on coins. |
|
Can-
is the first king of the Iceni to issue coins bearing his own name, based on
those issued by the Cantii. |
fl c.25 - 47? |
Antedios (Anted-) |
The abbreviated form of the name is found on coins. |
|
Antedios
issues coins bearing his name, but these are later retracted, perhaps due to
pressure being applied by other Iceni nobles. Subsequently, Antedios issues
coins marked 'ECEN', referring to the tribe's name. |
43/44 |
The
Iceni welcome the Romans
under Governor Aulus Plautius, probably being quite happy to see the fall of
their over-powerful neighbours, the
Catuvellauni. However,
judging by the coins issued around this period, some factions within the
Iceni may be unhappy with Rome's confirmation or acceptance of Antedios as
the sole ruler of the Iceni. Two nobles or rival kings issue their own coins
briefly. |
|
fl c. 45 |
Aesu- (Aesunos?) |
The abbreviated form of the name is found on coins. |
|
fl c. 45 |
Saemu- / Saenu- (Saenuvax?) |
The abbreviated form of the name is found on coins. |
47 |
While
handling an attack by hostile northern tribes immediately following
his appointment, the second Roman
Governor of
Britannia, Publius Ostorius Scapula, tries to disarm the
Iceni, but his heavy-handed tactics cause a serious uprising. This uprising
is put down with brutal efficiency by Rome following a battle, possibly at
Stonea Camp in Cambridgeshire. The Iceni officially become a client kingdom
and it is at this stage that the pro-Roman Prasutagus is apparently
installed, perhaps following the execution of all three previous contenders
for supremacy within the Iceni. |
47 - 59 |
Prasutagus |
Pro-Roman
client king. |
59 |
Once Prasutagus
dies, the Romans
begin to ignore the terms of the Iceni's client-statehood. The king had
stipulated in his will that half his property be given to Rome, but Roman
administrators interpret this as a submission to the Roman state, and move
to appropriate all of the Iceni lands and disarm the tribe. |
59 - 61 |
Queen Boudicca (Boadicea) |
Wife. Led the
uprising and later died by her own hand. |
59 - 61 |
Stirred up by imperial heavy-handedness, Boudicca (or Boudica) leads a
powerful Celtic uprising in AD 60 involving the
Iceni, the Trinovantes
and other tribes. It results in the loss to the Romans of lower eastern
Britain.
After sacking and burning Camulodunum (Colchester), Londinium, and Verulamium (St Albans
in the former Catuvellauni
territory), the Celts are confronted by a fresh
Roman
army under Governor Gaius Suetonius Paulinus somewhere along Watling Street. Coming
directly from warfare against the
Deceangli, Roman military discipline
and might proves unbeatable, the Celts are massacred and the rebellion is defeated.
Boudicca's fate is unknown, but it is presumed that she commits suicide rather than
allow herself to fall into Roman hands.
 |
|
Two sides of a coin issued about AD 61 showing the face of
Boudicca and a horse, which was a valuable commodity amongst the
Britons
|
|
|
|
To pacify the Iceni (or to reward a pro-Roman faction
which did not join the uprising), the Roman city of Venta Icenorum is
built (possibly over an Iceni town, although nothing has been found to
prove this). It is located at modern Caistor St Edmund (otherwise known
as Caistor-by-Norwich), immediately south of Norwich. Although perhaps
meant to be an impressive town, it seems to be little more than a run-down
outpost, with shoddy building quality away from the centre and plenty of
empty plots (possibly for grazing or cultivation). Celtic roundhouses are
even built near the walls, some in the second century AD, and a diagonal
road leads out of the town (very unusual in Roman towns) to a Celtic temple
to the north-east.
It seems that the Iceni resign themselves to their fate
and move into the new town, but they appear to be unprepared for urban life.
The town apparently fails to a large extent, becoming a backwater. The
once-important (and perhaps even great) Iceni tribe are relegated to
complete unimportance, living a very unremarkable (and unremarked) existence
on the edge of Roman Britain.
|
|
|
|
|
c.170 - 175 |
Coastal raids by barbarians have developed into a serious problem. Archaeological finds
for this period show a layer of destruction along a great deal of the North
Sea and Atlantic coast of Europe, between Belgica and southern Gaul, and in eastern
Britain, well inside the territory of the Iceni.
The Chauci are prime suspects for the raids, and
Rome
responds with improved defensive measures over the following thirty years or
so. Fortifications are put in place at sites including the Iceni
civitas of Venta Icenorum (modern Caistor-by-Norwich),
the
Trinovantes town of Caesaromagus (modern Chelmsford), and the civitas
of the Canninefates, Forum Hadriani (modern Voorburg). This is the start
of the system that will develop into the Saxon Shore in Britain.
|
|
|
|
c.240 - 275 |
Never
the success of other cantonal capitals, Venta has become increasingly vulnerable to Teutonic raids from the
start of the third century, and well-made
protective ramparts are built between these years. |
|
|
|
c.350 |
Here,
as elsewhere along the eastern shore,
Angle
and
Saxon
settlers are to be found in small communities from at least this date (if
not earlier), doubtlessly hired as laeti to aid the
British
defence of the area. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caer
Went
Following the expulsion of
Roman
administration from Britain, the
Iceni do not appear to have
re-emerged with a kingdom of their own. As with much of the south-east of
the country, the region apparently remained under British central control
for much of the fifth century, until the invading
Angles
took over. However, a possible territory or kingdom may have started to
emerge in the form of the postulated Caer Went. Or the name may simply have
been the Romano-British version of the town of Venta Icenorum. Unfortunately, there is
no firm information for any conclusion to be reached, probably owing to the
speed with which it was overrun by Angles.
Neglect of the Roman engineering works and land
subsidence after AD 450 reduced drained fenland to marsh, isolating Ely and
other islands in the west of the territory. Within these areas lived an independent people with dark-hair,
called the Gywre (or Gyrwas), who were possibly Celtic in origin. One theory
is that they were refugees from Caer Went. They
survived on a semi-independent basis until at least the middle of the seventh century.
|
|
|
|
c.475 - 495 |
Angles arrive
and begin to take over control of the region, settling first in the north. They intermingle with the
Saxon
descendants of
Roman foederati.
It is possible that the defenders of Venta Icenorum carry out some
ditch-digging to construct an enclosure in the north-west of the town.
Elements of this ditch have been found to cut through the Roman road there.
The marks in the ground made by possible structures are visible here.
 |
|
The Roman town of Venta Icenorum shown at its height, which was
probably short-lived and perhaps not as prosperous as shown
here. The unusual diagonal road leading to the north-east can
clearly be seen
|
|
|
c.495 - 560s |
The Angle
settlers secure their hold on the region, forming into two main
groups in the north and south (North and South Folk). There is the
possibility that the Iclingas
may be the first to gain any form of power in the region, as they appear to
take their name from the Iceni themselves. If this is correct then it shows
that the Iceni name does in fact survive this far (the
Cantware are another example of
the new arrivals taking an existing British
name for themselves).
Subsequently the Romano-British administration
collapses in the region and Venta Icenorum is abandoned (possibly following
a massacre of its people). The Anglian tribes form their own settlements,
ignoring the Roman city and most British place names, too. Only a half-dozen
Romano-British place names remain today in the region, such as Girton,
Comberton and Chatteris. During this period the Angles coalesce into the
East Angles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|