Anglo-Saxon Britain

For seven years, the Great Army of Vikings led by Ivarr the Boneless and Halfdan 'Wide Embrace' had been ravaging England.

Northumbria had been conquered, and their rival kings – Osberht and Aelle – had been slain. East Anglia was also taken, and its king, Edmund, martyred for refusing to abandon Christianity and accept the Viking gods.

In the south, Alfred, the young king of Wessex, paid off his enemies as he tried to rebuild his kingdom's armies after years of warfare.

Mercia, the great kingdom that spread from the Thames to the Humber, also suffered from Viking raids, and three times king Burgred, supported by his West Saxon allies, withstood the inevitable by 'coming to an agreement' with his opponents.

But, in 874, the Vikings moved their winter quarters from Lindsey to the Mercian royal residence at Repton, and drove out Burgred, who had appeased them those three times.
 

Chronology
 

It has been suggested that the Danish occupation of Repton was quite possibly aided by Burgred's political opponent, Ceolwulf II, of whom the Wessex propaganda machine – (ASC) had written– 'a foolish King's Thane' and:

"He swore them oaths and gave hostages, so that it would be ready for them on whatever day they would have it, and he himself ready, and all those who would follow him at the force's need."

It is easy to see Ceolwulf as a latter-day quisling only interested in feathering his own nest. After all, a Viking army was stationed in the heart of the kingdom and was raiding monasteries and plundering the rich lands with no sign of redress.

The blood of kings

There is the distinct probability however, that far from being a Viking puppet, Ceolwulf II did indeed have the blood of kings in his veins.

It seems likely that he was a direct descendent of Ceolwulf I and Coenwulf (of the rival 'C' Dynasty). It is also a possibility that those Mercians who supported him had promoted him, at Burgred's defection, rather than suffer a king appointed by the Vikings.

Another possibility is that the Mercians themselves toppled Burgred, with whom they had become disaffected, to promote his political rival, Ceolwulf; the Vikings being a mere catalyst to events. This suggests that the Mercians retained at least some control.

Certain areas to the south and west lay beyond Viking reach, which provided some grounds for hope that the kingdom may survive. By working with the Vikings, Ceolwulf II may just have preserved a rump of Mercian independence. Perhaps less of a quisling, more a Marshall Pétain. Ceolwulf and his bishops perhaps should be regarded as having accepted office to save their people from worse miseries, rather than as a bunch of self-interested traitors.

Friendship with Wessex

[It has also been suggested that the later similarities of design in the coinage of Alfred and Ceolwulf II is evidence of a similar relationship to that of Burgred and Alfred's predecessors, indicating that the two kings were allies. Thus the so-called 'two emperors' and 'cross and lozenge' coinages were minted in the names of both kings, and it is certainly true that Ceolwulf was recognised as the legitimate ruler of Mercia.

The derogatory and vitriolic tone of the pro-Wessex Chronicle might suggest that Ceolwulf II was not regarded as a friend of Wessex, and it has therefore also been mooted that the likelihood is that joint coinage and design similarities were introduced to ease trade and the process of exchange (to wit the euro!)

However, the fact that the two kings used the same moneyers would militate against this latter interpretation.

A similar design exists for Halfdan of Danish Northumbria, and by no stretch of the imagination could he be regarded as a friend to Anglo-Saxons; he was attempting to gain some trade advantage by mimicking the coins of his English neighbours. In this case it was just such a scheme.]

Mercian domains

Ceolwulf extended his control over southern Mercia, the Vikings clung on to the north. Nobody knows now exactly where the border was.

Ceolwulf ruled for five years, in alliance with Alfred, but seems to have died around 879. Subsequently, Alfred's historians partially re-wrote history to justify the supremacy of Wessex over the Midlands.

Alfred's son-in-law Æthelred undoubtedly ruled Mercia but seems not to have taken the title of king. On his death, his wife (Alfred's daughter) Æthelflæd was termed 'Lady of The Mercians', and she did much to preserve a vestige of Mercian independence. She died in 918.

Many commentators view this point as that which marks the beginning of an 'English Kingdom' and the end of independent Wessex and Mercia. However, things were not as simple.

The people wanted to keep their independence whilst retaining the alliance with Wessex. Therefore, Æthelflæd was succeeded by her daughter, Ælfwynn, as 'Lady of the Mercians', although her uncle, Edward the Elder of Wessex no doubt exerted considerable influence.

Ælfwynn, though, was not her mother and although circumstances were similar to when Æthelflæd assumed power in 911, they were not the same, and the inexperience of the young Ælfwynn was soon demonstrated and her reign foundered. She remained for six months before she was deposed by Edward, who ruled Mercia directly.

The Mercian nobility were acutely aware of the ever-present threat of Vikings on their borders, and the alliance with Wessex was essential to the preservation of their kingdom. Ælfwynn had proved unsuitable as their leader in such difficult times, so they accepted and encouraged the albeit temporary rule of Edward.

It was understood that the succession would pass to Athelstan whilst Edward's elder son, Ælfweard would ascend the throne of Wessex. Edward was therefore not the first king of a united England, but rather the king of two independent kingdoms – a situation that didn't really begin to be resolved until the accession of Æthelred II.

Text copyright © Mick Baker. An original feature for The History Files.