The Nothgyth Quest Hypothesis
by David Slaughter, 3 February 2008
Part 4: The (conjectured) dynasty of Aethelwalh Cynegilsing,
descended from Cerdic, founder of Wessex
There is the evidence of the chroniclers and/or the witness
lists of South Saxon charters for the existence of all the nobility
whose entries are to be found in this section.
Aethelwalch, born in the early 620s? 
The theory here is that Aethelwalh was the second eldest of the four surviving sons of
Cynegils, king of the West Saxons, and appointed by Penda, the king
of the Mercians, as the unitary king of the South Saxons in 645.
Thus the kingdom founded by Cissa in 514 was re-established in 645.
Nothgyth Quest Supporting Notes
Anglo-Saxon Apartheid Theory
Light Enters Dark Age Londinium
Assessing Anglo-Saxon Invasions
RULERS OF ENGLAND:
Anglo-Saxon Kings of Sussex at
anglo-saxonkingsofsussex blogspot (dead link)
Old English - University of Calgary
To speculate further, it appears that rather than take a concubine, Aethelwalch cohabited with a number of women, who were perhaps
connected to royal estates, before and during the early years of his
reign, by whom he had four illegitimate sons (see the entries
immediately below), their names not being dynastic.
In the context
of this hypothesis, it was only later that he married Eafe of Hwicce
(born early 640s?), by whom he had a son (born early 660s?).
also conjectured that Eafe gave him two other children, Aethelthryth
(born circa 665?), and Aethelstan (born late 660s?). His union with Eafe almost certainly took place in 661, at the insistence of the
Christian Wulfhere, king of the Mercians.
History tells us that in
the same year Wulfhere had gained supremacy over Sussex and, also,
that the chosen Eafe was a Christian princess. Bede says that in
675, in return for his having been baptised, Aethelwalh gained the
Mercians territories of the Jutish Meonware and the Isle of Wight.
These were ceded to him by Wulfhere, he having been godfather at
Aethelwalh's baptism. The new possessions had previously formed part
of Wessex, until they were seized by Wulfhere during 661.
As a result of this development, Arwald of the Isle of Wight had a
new overlord, and the borders of the South Saxon kingdom reached
their greatest extent. Taking account of a tradition from the Isle
of Wight that the king of Sussex and his son were killed at Shalcombe Down, maybe it was on this down that Aethelwalh was
assassinated in 685 (probably by the exiled West Saxon atheling, Caedwalla himself), together with his eldest son by Queen Eafe who
was killed while defending his elderly father. The name of the young
prince is unknown, but 'Aethelric' is a distinct possibility, since
Aethelthryth (according to this hypothesis his elder sister) was to
call her firstborn son Osric, perhaps in line with contemporary
For her conjectured children, the reader is referred
back to the entries for Osric and Osa.
Watt, born early 640s?
Surmised here to have been the eldest of Aethelwalh's four illegitimate sons.
He appears not to have taken
part during the turbulent months which followed his presumed father's
assassination. He became a co-ruling king of the South Saxons,
probably appointed by Ine of Wessex in 688, sharing power with Nothhelm, the dominant ruler, in the early years of the latter's
Also conjecturally, Queen Aethelthryth of the South Saxons
was the half sister of Watt.
Berhthun and Andhun, born circa 645?
A nineteenth century illustration of Bishop Wilfrid, who was imprisoned in an unlit dungeon by King Ecgfrith,
after a disagreement. The saintly bishop recited psalms causing
light to shine about him.
The conjecture here is that
they were the illegitimate sons of Aethelwalh, who entered their
father's service as his personal royal aldermen. They were recorded
by Bede as being the king's aldermen. Historically they were almost
certainly twins. Bede also records that, after Aethelwalh's
assassination, they drove out Caedwalla from the lands ceded to
Sussex by Wulfhere, and then ruled jointly over the South Saxons
It is known that Berhthun was killed in 686 while
invading Kent to quell an uprising. The documented cause for his
invasion went back to the death of the Kentish King Hlothere, who
died in February 685 fighting a force of South Saxons lead by his
nephew Eadric. Eadric then shared the Kentish throne with Suaebhard
of Essex, supported by the South Saxons. On Berhthun's death,
Caedwalla, by now king of the West Saxons, again invaded the
territories of Sussex and crushed the South Saxons. Bede's account
of this military campaign suggests that little mercy was shown to
the people of Sussex by Caedwalla.
Bryni, born early 650s?
It is surmised here that he was the youngest of Aethelwalh's four illegitimate sons. Evidently he
did not take any part in the events of 685 and 686, but he was later
recorded in his charter of circa 700, witnessed by the kings Nothhelm and Watt, as
duke of the South Saxons. He appears to have
been the first South Saxon alderman to hold this title and it would
make sense that he held it owing to high status, for example because
his father had been king Aethelwalh. In his charter, Bryni granted
four hides at Highleigh in Sussex to Eadberht, the Abbot of Selsey.
The Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms AD 700
A map of South Saxon power in 685
Aethelstan, born in the late 660s
The conjecture in this
entry, includes his being appointed king, by Ine, on Nothhelm's
death in 722, that he was the eldest surviving son of King
Aethelwalh and Queen Eafe, his older full sister being Aethelthryth,
and that on the death of his illegitimate half brother, the
co-ruling King Watt, at the beginning of the eighth century,
Aethelstan was appointed to succeed him by Ine of Wessex. Aethelstan
was to witness a charter, granted by Nothhelm in 717 to the
monks of Selsey, in the presence of his presumed full sister Queen
Aethelthryth, but in the absence of the dominant ruler.
documented history, the following is argued here conjecturally.
Firstly, that on the death of Aethelstan's senior partner, Nothhelm, perhaps in 722, Aethelberht, was appointed by Ine of
Wessex as the dominant king of the South Saxons, and to be the
unitary king on Aethelstan's death. Secondly, that the said
Aethelberht was the eldest son of Aethelstan. Thirdly, that
Aethelstan had a younger son, Ealdberht, who was the Ealdberht
recorded as a dissident. Further, it is contended that Ealdberht
rebelled because he was aggrieved that he had not been included in
the elevation to kingship.
It is also conjectured that Aethelstan, who
had seen so much bloodshed in his youth, was able to stay the hand
of Ealdberht, after the latter had been defeated by Ine in 722.
Finally, it is contended that when Aethelstan died, in 725,
Ealdberht decided to gather another force of South Saxons and once
again prepare for battle. Ine defeated Ealdberht for a second time,
the latter losing his life in combat. Ealdberht's uprisings of 722
and 725 are to be found in the Anglo-Saxon chronicles.
Aethelberht, born late 690s?
Account should be taken of the
genealogical conjecture already stated that he was the eldest son of
the co-ruling king, Athelstan, and the elder brother of the
Ealdberht who was recorded as a dissident by the chroniclers. Aethelberht was very likely appointed the dominant king of the South
Saxons on the death of Nothhelm, his presumed uncle-in-law, claimed
to have been in 722 in this hypothesis.
Following the argument here, Ealdberht then rebelled against Ine because he had not been
elevated to the kingship as well. This supposed motive is discussed more
fully in the entry for Ealdberht, below. The chroniclers say that
Ealdberht was then driven out of Wessex and forced to find sanctuary
on the Sussex-Surrey border, with the South Saxons. Defeated by Ine
on the Sussex border in 722, Ealdberht was defeated and killed in a
second battle in 725.
Later Sub-kings of Kent and Sussex
The Saxon church at Worth in Sussex.
It is said that during the crusades mounted knights filed through
one door, were blessed, and then rode through another exit on their
way to the coast.
On the death of Athelstan, claimed here to have been in the same
year, it is conjectured that Aethelberht
became the unitary king of the South Saxons. It is presumed here
that during the middle years of his reign, possibly after 730, when
King Aethelheard of the West Saxons lost Berkshire to the Mercians,
Aethelberht was able to take advantage of a less powerful Wessex,
and throw off a West Saxon yoke that had already been weakened by
the abdication of Ine in 726. The commentary of Bede on this matter
is relevant here. If this indeed is what happened, then under the
rule of Aethelberht, the South Saxons would have experienced a last,
strong, native king, his eldest son, Ealdwulf, being destined to
succeed to a stable and unitary kingship. Taking that as the case,
then Osmund, assumed above as the eldest grandson of Nothhelm, had
clearly laid plans to outmanoeuvre the young heir on his father's
death. When Aethelberht died, probably in 758, Ealdwulf, would have
found himself opposed by his much older and politically adroit
second cousin, Osmund, who then established a new regime of plural
Ealdberht, born early 700s?
In terms of the conjecture in this
entry, he was the second son of Athelstan and voiced his grievances
at not being elevated to kingship with his elder brother,
Aethelberht, when their uncle, Nothhelm, died in 722. Perhaps the
attitude of the dissident Ealdberht, or his unwise actions - he might
have threatened rebellion, or challenged the royal authority of King Ine
- led to Ine deciding to exile him.
It is documented that the penalised
prince took refuge in the fortress at Taunton, which had been built
as a defence against the West Britons. Queen Aethelburh, Ine's
consort, destroyed the fortress, but Ealdberht escaped to the
Sussex-Surrey border. Evidently he had supporters there who were
ready to give him sanctuary. According to the annals, Ealdberht must
have raised a fighting force of South Saxon warriors, and prepared
for battle. In the ensuing contest of arms against Ine and his
West Saxon army Ealdberht was defeated. Conceivably, it was
Aethelstan, who had witnessed times of murder and bloodshed in his
youth (see the conjecture in the entry for him above), who managed
to stay the hand of his rebellious son and broker some kind of peace
following Ine's victory. The annals then tell us that in 725,
assumed here to have been the year of Aethelstan's death, Ealdberht
gathered another force of South Saxons and again prepared for
battle. Once again Ine defeated Ealdberht's warriors and the
young prince lost his life in the heat of battle.
Ealdwulf, born in the early 730s?
The Norman interior of Steyning church. Aethelwulf,
king of Kent and Sussex, who died in 858, would have been buried in the†
wooden church of St Cuthman. The present Church was dedicated to Andrew,
patron†saint of Normandy.
In this entry the conjecture is that he was the eldest son of Aethelberht
and destined to succeed his father as the unitary king of the South
Saxons, but that on Aethelberht's death in 758, Ealdwulf's second cousin, Osmund
Osricing, was able to assert himself as the dominant ruler in
In terms of the genealogy in this hypothesis, Osmund would
have been some two decades older than Ealdwulf and politically far
more experienced. On charter evidence it can be said that Ealdwulf
was recognised as the senior ranking co-ruler, but his power would
have been curtailed by being obliged to co-operate with Osmund's
presumed co-ruling brothers, both of whom must have been older than
Ealdwulf, who is known to have lived until the 790s. The Osmundian
regime weakened regnal authority in Sussex, a development that
proved fatal to the South Saxon monarchy. That Ealdwulf was deposed
by Offa in 772, but was appointed later as the third duke of
the South Saxons, is historical fact.
Aethelwulf, born circa 735?
It is surmised here that he was Ealdwulf's younger brother. He
held no royal office under the dominant Osmund and he held no share
of power during the earlier years of Offa's ducal deputies in Sussex. However, it
appears that Aethelwulf was allowed some share in authority during
the tenure of Offa's third duke, assumed here to have been his elder
brother, since Aethelwulf was the only witness to Ealdwulf's last
ducal charter which was drawn up in 791.
Conjectural table showing Ealhmund, king of Kent, and
Aethelmund, an alderman of Sussex, as agnates based on
the Justinian Law of Succession
Continued in Part 5
Images are free from copyright. Text copyright © David Slaughter, BA Hons, ATC (Sussex),
Blue Robe Order of the Welsh Gorsedd, expanded from material first released on
the Anglo-Saxon Kings of Sussex blogspot. An original
feature for the History Files.