|
|
Hamath
/ Hamah
Hamath was the northernmost city in the mountainous region of the Levant, in
the border territory between that and ancient Syria,
and was the fortress that protected the rest of the Levant from northern
invaders.
Located on the River Orontes, it still exists as the city of Hama in modern western
Syria, to
the north of
Damascus. The ancient city was probably one of many which arose in the region at
the start of the second millennium BC. It very quickly became heavily
influenced by
Hittite
culture, and remained under their influence for the first 800 years or so of
its existence. During the dark age from 1200 BC it was settled by
Aramaeans
who founded a state. The first two rulers were apparently allied to King
David of
Israel, and the two kingdoms maintained friendly relations for hundreds
of years afterwards. |
|
|
|
18th cent BC |
The city becomes heavily influenced by the
Hittites. |
|
|
|
c.1200 - 1000 BC |
Following the political collapse of this period which sees the end of the
Hittites,
the region is heavily settled by Aramaeans, and Hamath is no exception.
Initially the southernmost of the neo-Hittite states, the
city becomes the centre of a small Aramaean kingdom. At first it may also control the
newly created city of Bit Adini. |
|
|
|
fl c.1010 - 990 BC |
To'u |
|
c.1005 BC |
One of the city's allies in this period is
Israel under King David, and this friendship remains in place for
centuries. |
fl c. 990 - 960 BC |
Joram / Hadoram |
|
|
|
|
|
c.900 BC |
Bit Adini may achieve
independence at this time, if indeed it had at all previously been controlled by Hamath. |
|
|
|
fl 860s BC |
Zakir I |
|
|
c.850s BC |
The political situation of the land of
Lukhuti, on
Hamath's northern border, is not
clear. By the reign of Shalmaneser III (859-824 BC) it probably forms the
northern province of Hamath, and perhaps does so as early as 870 BC, before
which it is in the possession of
Pattin.
 |
|
An inscription of Zakir, king of Hamath in the ninth century BC
|
|
|
fl 850s - c.847 BC |
Irkhuleni / Irhuleni
(Urhilina) |
Member of the
Samarian alliance. (Son of
Paritas.) |
853 BC |
Irhuleni is a member of an alliance of states which also includes
Ammon,
Arvad,
Byblos, Damascus,
Edom,
Egypt,
Kedar, and
Samaria.
Together they fight Shalmaneser III of
Assyria
in a battle which consists of the largest known number of combatants to
date, and is the first historical mention of the Arabs from the southern
deserts. Despite claims to the contrary, the Assyrians are defeated, since
they do not press on to their nearest target, Hamath, and do not resume
their attacks on Hamath and Damascus for about six years. |
c.847 BC |
The city is conquered by
Assyria
and local governors or vassal kings are placed in control of the state.
Uratamis is only attested by inscriptions on five stones which form part of
a fortress in Hamath, perhaps the citadel itself. |
c.847 - ? BC |
Uratamis |
Son. Otherwise unattested. Vassal? |
fl 830 BC |
Zakir II / Zakkur |
Vassal king? |
|
Ben-Hadad III of Damascus leads a coalition of states against Zakir, and
Luash to the north
of Damascus, but is defeated by the latter. |
fl 765 BC |
Zakir III |
Vassal king? |
fl 740s - 730s BC |
Enil-Ilu / Eniel |
Became an Assyrian vassal king, or 'governor'. |
|
c.740? - 737 BC |
The region faces a rebellion of some magnitude. Hamath, nearby
Sam'al, and many others,
are attacked by Yadiya
under Azriyau of Yaudi, possibly with support from Urartu. Azriyau's
coalition is defeated by Tiglath-Pileser III. In 738 BC, Hamath becomes a
confirmed vassal of Assyria at the same time as the territories to the
north, Lukhuti and
Pattin,
fall. |
? - 720 BC |
Yahu-Bihdi |
Assyrian governor.
Israelite
or Israelite-inspired name. |
720 BC |
With the change of dynasty in
Assyria,
Yahu-Bindi takes the opportunity to declare himself king of Hamath and lead
a rebellion. |
720 - 719 BC |
Yahu-Bihdi |
King of Hamath. |
719 BC |
The rebellion is quickly suppressed, and large numbers of the city's
population are deported to
Samaria, which has recently been conquered by
Assyria,
where they become part of the later Samaritan people. The city itself is
destroyed and Hamath is now a province of Assyria. |
|
|
|
554/553 BC |
Occupied Hamath is the target of an attack by Nabonidus of
Babylonia. |
539 - 332 BC |
The city falls under the control of the
Persian empire. |
332 BC |
The city becomes part of the
Greek empire, and Hamath is later officially renamed Epiphania, probably
in honour of
Seleucid king Antiochus Epiphanes. The inhabitants take no notice and
continue to use the old name. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|