|
|
Alep / Aleppo (State of Yamkhad / Amkhad)
Starting out as one of the world's oldest inhabited settlements in the
eleventh century BC, Alep (modern Aleppo) has been continuously inhabited
since around 5000 BC. Strategically located on the trade route from the Euphrates Valley to the
Mediterranean, it prospered as one of the northern
Syrian city states from around
the middle of the third millennium BC.
Following a downturn in the region's
fortunes shortly before the collapse of
Ur, Alep was ripe for takeover by the newly dominant
Amorites, along with some
Hurrian groups. They expanded the city state to form the small kingdom of Yamkhad,
still centred on the city of Alep, with their most stubborn opponent in the west
being the rival state of
Qatna.
Since the city has been continuously inhabited for perhaps seven thousand years,
excavations there are impossible, and any account has to be assembled based
on outside sources.
|
|
|
|
|
c.2260s BC |
Ibbi
Sippis of the powerful city of Ebla
concludes treaties with
Canaanite Alep (or Armi), its close neighbour in the region. |
|
|
|
c.2004 BC |
Following the collapse of
Sumer,
Amorites gain control of much of
Mesopotamia, including the
Syrian city of Alep.
The city comes to prominence for the first time, perhaps after
Ebla's loss of independence, but records
are sparse for the first two centuries of its existence as the state of
Yamkhad. The small city
state of
Alakhtum
is probably a vassal from the start, as are the cities of
Arpad and
Tuba. |
|
|
|
? - c.1780 BC |
Sumu'epuh |
|
c.1800? BC |
Yahdun-Lim of
Mari sends troops north to join Sumu'epuh's forces in fighting several hostile
Syrian states, including
Tuttul, defeating their armies
and attacking their cities. |
|
Both Sumu'epuh and his son become involved in wars against Shamshi-Adad's
kingdom of
Upper Mesopotamia, as that state supports its fierce rival,
Qatna. Sum'epuh also sells the
territory of Alakhtum to his son-in-law, Zimri-Lim,
who, in 1776 BC becomes king of
Mari. |
c.1780 - 1765 BC |
Yarim-Lim I |
Son. |
|
c.1776 BC |
Yamkhad and
Eshnunna attack and destroy the kingdom of
Upper Mesopotamia. Yarim-Lim is free to expand his kingdom down the Euphrates
Valley as far as the borders of
Mari, with whom relations are friendly as
the ruler, Zimri-Lim, is Yarim-Lim's brother-in-law. Now more powerful than Hammurabi of
Babylon
in terms of his level of support, a letter excavated from
Mari claims Yarim-Lim is followed by twenty [lesser] kings, including those
of Ugarit and
Ebla. |
c.1765 - 1760 BC |
Hammurabi I |
Son. |
c.1761 BC |
After
Hammurabi of
Babylon turns on
Mari
and conquers it, contact between Yamkhad and the south comes to an end, with
Yamkhad seemingly regaining the city of
Alakhtum. Hammurabi of Alep
appears to be the acknowledged overlord of all of northern
Syria and
Mesopotamia at this time. |
c.1760 - ? BC |
Abba'el / Abba-ili
/ Abban
I |
Relationship unknown, possibly son. |
|
There follows a reorganisation of Yamkhad's state following what may be a
revolt (which is otherwise undocumented).
Abba'el places his brother (another Yarim-Lim) on the throne of
Alakhtum. |
|
Yarim-Lim /
Yarimlim II |
Son. |
|
Niqmepa /
Niqmiepu' I |
Son. |
|
Irkabtum |
Son. |
|
c.1650 - 1620 BC |
Yamkhad now controls north-western
Syria,
dominating Qatna, and as a result
becomes a key target for attacks by the newly created
Hittite kingdom to its north. They attack and destroy several of Yamkhad's vassals over several
years, such as
Alakhtum,
Carchemish, and Hashshu, and
the two states compete over
Urkesh further
east, but Alep itself survives despite several campaigns in
the region. |
|
Yarim-Lim III |
Brother of Irkabtum, or younger son of Niqmepa. |
? - c.1595 BC |
Hammurabi II |
Son. (Sometimes listed before his father.) |
|
c.1595 BC |
Mursili's
Hittites capture and destroy Alep on their way south to sack
Babylon,
ending the political situation that has been holding the
Syrian states
together. There is a gap of around a century before a new ruling elite
emerges. The collapse in authority in the region allows a greater influx of
Hurrians into
Anatolia and Syria. |
|
|
|
|
Abba'el / Abba-ili
II |
|
fl c.1500 BC |
Ili Illima /
Ilimilimma I |
Murdered at the same time as Idrimi fled. |
|
c.1470s BC |
The
Mitanni expand their empire westwards to encompass Alep (which they call
Halab). There is a popular rebellion within the state that
may be encouraged or orchestrated by Parrattarna of Mitanni so that he can
secure overlordship. If so, it succeeds when Ili Illima is murdered and his son is forced to
flee.
|
|
Idrimi |
Son. Forced to flee and later conquered
Alakhtum. |
|
? |
Vassal or puppet ruler, or direct
Mitanni rule? |
|
It seems that Idrimi's son later extends his territorial control from the
family's new home in
Alakhtum to reclaim his
ancestral seat. This is probably under
Mitanni domination.
|
c.1450 - 1425 BC |
Niqmepa /
Niqmiepu' II |
Son. King of
Alakhtum. |
fl c.1420 BC |
Ili Illima /
Ilimilimma II |
Son. King of
Alakhtum. |
|
|
|
|
c.1370 - 1340 BC |
Suppiluliuma, the new
Hittite ruler, takes direct control of much of northern
Syria,
including Alep and Arpad, placing Hittites on the throne. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hittite Princes of Alep
Once Suppiluliuma had reorganised
Hittite control of northern
Syria, Hittite
princes were placed on the throne of Alep as regional representatives of the empire,
but either this was not a permanent arrangement or there are gaps in the
record. However, Alep was still the most prominent city in north-western
Syria.
|
fl c.1360s BC |
Telipinu /
Telepinush |
Son of
Hittite ruler,
Suppiluliuma, |
|
|
|
fl c.1330 BC |
Talmi-Sharruma |
|
|
|
|
fl mid-1200s BC |
Rimisharina |
|
|
|
|
|
c.1200 BC |
With the collapse of the
Hittite empire, and the general instability which grips the region, some
cities in Syria are destroyed, while
others such as Alep, fall under the control of
Aramaeans.
 |
|
Treaty between the Hittite king Mursili II and Talmi-sharruma of Aleppo to
regulate future relations between the two states
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.1115 - 1077 BC |
Under Tiglath-Pileser I, the
Assyrians temporarily conquer the region. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lukhuti / Hatarikka-Luhuti (Lu'as / Luash)
During the early first millennium, Aleppo was occupied by
Aramaeans who formed a small
state which is very poorly documented. At the same time, Aleppo itself was
known as Halman, and this changed over time to Hatarikka (or Hadrach, in the
Old Testament). While this Iron Age Aleppo may initially have been independent, it quickly
formed a southern province for
Pattin, before falling
into the hands of Hamath.
|
|
|
|
|
c.900s BC |
Aleppo is the capital of the poorly documented region or state which is
known as Lukhuti. By around 900 BC it is probably controlled by
Pattin. |
|
|
|
|
c.870 BC |
The
Assyrians obtain submission from a number of cities in the region,
solving the problem of Aramaean
incursions into their territory. The frontier fortress of Aribua within the land of
Lukhuti (probably Late Bronze Age Nukhashe, and possibly within the
neighbourhood of modern Idlib) is one of the locations to be ravaged. |
|
|
|
|
c.850s BC |
Lukhuti forms part of the state of
Hamath by this date, if not as
early as 870 BC. |
c.847 BC |
Hamath is conquered by
Assyria
and local governors or vassal kings are placed in control of the state. |
|
|
|
c.796 BC |
Ben-Hadad III of
Damascus leads a coalition
of states against Zakir of Hamath,
and Luash, but is defeated by the latter. |
|
|
|
|
738 BC |
Hamath becomes a
confirmed vassal of
Assyria at the same time as the territories to
its
north, Lukhuti and
Pattin,
fall. |
|
|
|
|
609 BC |
Following the destruction of the
Assyrian empire, the region is governed by successive empires;
Babylon,
Persia,
Macedon, the
Seleucid empire,
Armenia,
Rome,
the Islamic empire, and then the
Hamdanids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|