Hosting costs for the History Files website have been increased
by an eye-watering 40% in 2025. This non-profit site is
only able to keep going with your help. Please make a
donation to keep it online. Thank you!
European Kingdoms
Italic Tribes
Proto-Italics / Italic Tribes (West
Indo-Europeans) c.2600 - 1800 BC
Incorporating Italic Bell Beaker Culture (Bronze Age)
The story of Italic-speakers and proto-Italics is one which
links back to the earliest appearance of
Indo-Europeans in
Europe. In very basic
terms, Europe of the late third millennium BC provided a home for a
group of recently-arrived Indo-European people who spoke what was
essentially the same language.
This
was a centum branch (a
West
Indo-European-speaking branch) which later divided into
the Italic,
Celtic,
Adriatic
Venetic, Liburnian, and Illyrian language groups. Possibly
the Vistula
Venedi too. A date for the split is conjectural, but 3100-2600
BC seems likely (see the 'Indo-Europeans' entry and the feature
link for a more detailed discussion).
As time passed these groups began to drift apart, each group speaking
the language a little differently. Along what was probably the
southern and western edge of these tribes, each group began to expand
farther south and west. One group settled in what is now north-eastern
Italy in the region
of Venice (the Adriatic Veneti). But these migrants formed the origin
of the proto-Italics - not just the ancestors of tribes which later
entered Italy itself but all of these initial arrivals in
Central Europe.
It
was these West Indo-Europeans who, upon their arrival along the
Danube and in Central Europe, picked up the influence of the
originally-IberianBell Beaker
horizon (see the index link, right, for a full list of early human
cultures). They did so enthusiastically, turning it into a true
Bell Beaker
culture, and many of them continued their migration westwards into
France and
areas of Bronze
Age Iberia while others of their number remained in northern
Italy and around the Alps and southern
Germany,
also practitioners of Bell Beaker culture.
The remainers were eventually joined by later migratory groups of
Indo-Europeans who settled to their north to become the
Q-Celtic-speaking
proto-Celts. The
earlier Italic settlers were themselves Q-Italic speakers, and it
was they who formed the basis of all later Italic Tribes.
The very closely-related proto-Illyrians of the northern
Balkans may have
been little different to start with - if at all.
But even those Italics which entered the Italian peninsula then
divided into two main groups. One of those included the
Latins and Faliscans
who largely retained their Q-Italic language (perhaps because they
became surrounded by
Etruscans who
probably prevented any outside influences from reaching them).
The bulk of the rest developed into P-Italic speakers.
An exact date for that further migration into the Italian peninsula
is not known precisely, but is estimated to fall between the twelfth
to eighth centuries BC. It may have been sparked - as were many other
migrations - by the shift to a drier climate at the end of the
thirteenth century BC which caused such chaos in the
Hittite empire.
Proto-Italic tribes gradually made their way into Italy and
Illyria, where in both case they often bumped up against Greek
settlements in the south and, in the former case, the early
Etruscans in the centre and west. The Latins were soon dominated
by Etruscans, from whom they learned to read, write, and organise
their society in a civilised fashion - an education which
eventually lead to
Rome's
dominance.
The Romans recorded the existence of their tribal relatives in
Italy, bounded by
Alpine tribes to
the far north, so snippets of those languages were also recorded.
These included Adriatic Venetic, probably the Liburnian and
Illyrian language groups, and likely the
Vindelician and
Ligurian also.
Rather than merely being tribes which dominated Italy, the
proto-Italic-speaking peoples should be regarded as the very first
wave of Indo-Europeans to enter central and Western Europe from the
steppe to become widespread across much of Europe.
Genetic testing confirms that these R1b people were associated with
the Bell Beaker physical culture, especially in
Britain, and perhaps less so in Iberia. In fact, the first wave of
Bell Beaker folk appear to have been ninety per cent R1b, indicating
that they either drove away, killed, or simply sidelined the men of
the Neolithic Y-DNA type I (I1, I2) peoples who had long inhabited
Central Europe.
Later, many of the Italic-speaking peoples towards northern Italy
and in Central Europe appear to have become dominated and
assimilated by their West Indo-European relatives, the
Celtic-speakers, but the Romans later returned the favour by
conquering all of their Celtic relatives except those in
Ireland and the northern third of Britain.
On Sicily the
Elymi,
Sicani, and
Siculi were also
to be found. On
Sardinia there were
the Sardi, and
on Corsica there were
the Corsi. Bell
Beaker culture in northern Italy may have descended into the
subsequent
Terramare
culture.
Principal author(s):Page created:Page last updated:
(Information by Edward Dawson and Peter Kessler, with additional information
from The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the
Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World, David W Anthony, from The
La Tene Celtic Belgae Tribes in England: Y-Chromosome Haplogroup R-U152 -
Hypothesis C, David K Faux, from A Genetic Signal of Central
European Celtic Ancestry, David K Faux, from Researches into the
Physical History of Mankind, Vol 3, Issue 1, James Cowles Prichard,
from The Roman History: From Romulus and the Foundation of Rome to
the Reign of the Emperor Tiberius, Velleius Paterculus, J C Yardley,
& Anthony A Barrett, from An Historical Geography of Europe,
Norman J G Pounds (Abridged Version), and from External Link:
The
Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe
(Nature).)
2500 BC
It would seem to be around this time that a process begins in which the
so-called
West
Indo-European tribes, most of whom speak dialects which are
intelligible to each other and quite probably to
South-West
Indo-Europeans too, start a long process of fracturing and
dividing.
There is also an unrelated group which is not as closely related to
these two which follows a path along the northern reaches of Europe,
eventually to become the
Germanic-speaking
people.
By around 3000 BC the Indo-Europeans had begun their
mass migration away from the Pontic-Caspian steppe,
with the bulk of them heading westwards towards the
heartland of Europe (click or tap on map to view
full sized)
West Indo-European speakers appear to form a divide into two groupings
due to location and contacts. One of these can be linked to the
Bell Beaker culture
which continues to migrate farther west and in time enters
Bronze Age Iberia
to integrate into existing cultures or to replace them with new ones,
such as Cogotas II.
Of the remainder, the northern group becomes isolated from direct
contact with the Mediterranean civilisations and these people become
the proto-Celts of the
Urnfield culture.
c.1300 - 800 BC
The southern group of
West
Indo-Europeans and
South-West
Indo-Europeans appear to be prompted to migrate westwards
and southwards, into the Italian piedmont and western
Balkans
respectively, and through Illyria and northern Italy.
The international system in the Near East has recently been creaking
under the strain of increasing waves of peasants and the poor leaving
the cities and abandoning crops. Around the end of the thirteenth
century BC the entire region is also hit by drought and the loss of
surviving crops.
Climate-induced drought in the thirteenth century
BC created great instability in the entire eastern
Mediterranean region, resulting in mass migration in
the Balkans, as well as the fall of city states and
kingdoms further east (click or tap on map to view
full sized)
The same climate-induced hardships also hit the descendants of
Indo-European settlers along the Danube and in
Romania,
descendants who have already expanded into the northern Balkans.
They begin to search out food and better circumstances, perhaps
also helped on by the growing dominance of the
Urnfield culture
(in the local form of the Gava culture) to the north.
Due to terrain, they divide further into semi-isolated tribes. They
become more civilised in their habits and their forms of technology
due to contact with southern Greeks and
Etruscans. Those in
the Balkans in part cross by sea into the Italian peninsula, and
settle mostly along the south-eastern coast (notably as the
Iapyges).
Early Etruscan civilisation was heavily influenced
by the Phoenicians and Greeks and, in turn, it
influenced early Roman (Latin) culture
Those groups which have filtered down from the north Italian
piedmont occupy swathes of central Italy, with two tribes,
Latins and Faliscans,
crossing over the Apennines to the west coast (probably disrupting
the Apennine culture
in the process).
Due to their semi-isolation to the west of Italy their language
does not undergo the 'qu/kw' to 'p' shift which occurs across
most of the West Indo-European dialects. It is the Latins who
found the
Villanova
culture and, eventually, the city of
Rome.