History Files
 

Please donate to help

Contributed: £174

Target: £526

2023
Totals slider
2023

Hosting costs for the History Files website have been increased by an eye-watering 40% in 2025. This non-profit site is only able to keep going with your help. Please make a donation to keep it online. Thank you!

Far East Kingdoms

Early Cultures

 

Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex / Oxus Civilisation (Bronze Age) (Central Asia)
c.2200 - 1700 BC

FeatureThe city states of Sumer formed one of the first great civilisations in human history (see feature link). This Near Eastern civilisation emerged a little way ahead of that of Africa's ancient Egypt, and up to a millennium before that of the Indus Valley culture.

Southern Mesopotamia (modern Iraq and the western edge of Iran) was subjected to permanent settlement during the Pottery Neolithic. The neighbouring region of Elam emerged during the late fifth and early fourth millennia BC. To its east there also emerged a series of small cities and regional states.

These stretched across the Iranian plateau which reached towards the modern Pakistan border, and northwards into central Iran. They also connected with similar advanced settlements on the southern coast of the Caspian Sea, such as at Tepe Hissar, and others which emerged to the north-east of that, such as those of the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex, otherwise referred to as the 'Oxus Civilisation', or BMAC for ease of use.

This complex was largely centred on the later provinces of Bactria and Margiana, but it also extended into surrounding later provinces. It is partially overlapped by the more recently-proposed concept of the Greater Khorasan civilisation, which can be used to detail BMAC-like finds across central and southern Afghanistan and in north-eastern Iran to succeed the more limited Helmand culture.

Following the fading of the Kel'teminar around 3000 BC, towards its end migrating Zamin-Babis tribes seemingly evolved the fundamental points of the BMAC as they moved eastwards to form what is sometimes referred to as the Suyargan culture. This is often treated as a precursor to the BMAC, or even a sub-division of it, but its emergence post-dates the emergence of the BMAC by about two centuries (although the BMAC's own emergence is sometimes extended to about 2250 BC).

After a gap of around a millennium and-a-half, the Kel'teminar in the north was succeeded by the Tazabagyab culture which itself was a southern expression of the now-dominant Andronovo horizon. This formed the core of Indo-Iranian occupation to the north of the BMAC, although the people of the BMAC itself were indigenous natives, not Indo-Iranians, and the BMAC originated though influences other than those of the Kel'teminar.

From what so far is known, it is clear that the Jiroft and Helmand cultures preceded by several centuries the formation of the BMAC, and were roughly contemporaneous with the Indus Valley civilisation. All three of these civilisations are in turn considered to have played a defining role in the formation of the BMAC, a proposition which has been confirmed by ancient DNA evidence.

The BMAC itself lacks a clear historical identity. Its leadership structure is unknown. No rulers are named, whether they be of individual cities or the BMAC as a whole (the latter is far less likely anyway, given the fragmented nature of kingship across the entirety of the third millennium BC Near East).

The polity's origins are also obscure and open to discussion. One strand of thought suggests that it was formed by Chalcolithic migrations in the fifth millennium BC from central Iran (up to a thousand years prior to the formation of the Jiroft and Helmand cultures). These newcomers brought with them metallurgy and other innovations and seemingly integrated into Neolithic 'Jeitun period' farmer communities in Margiana.

An opposing view which is supported by archaeology supports a clear break in regional occupation between the late Neolithic and the early Chalcolithic. The Jeitun farmers were no longer occupying the area when it was recolonised in the millennium prior to the appearance of the BMAC.

Major Chalcolithic settlements sprang up at Kara-Depe and Namazga-Depe, while smaller settlements appeared at Anau, Dashlyji, and Yassy-Depe. Similar early settlements emerged in the east, on the ancient River Tedzen delta around the Geoksiur oasis. Cultural unity divided around 3500 BC, with two pottery styles emerging: colourful in the more populous west at Anau, Kara-Depe, and Namazga-Depe and more austere in the more sparsely-populated east at Altyn-Depe and the Geoksiur oasis settlements.

Around 3000 BC people from Geoksiur migrated into the Murghab delta to create small, scattered settlements which also stretched farther east into the Zerafshan valley in Transoxiana, and with both areas employing Geoksiur-type pottery. The early Bronze Age between about 2800-2400 BC witnessed the Altyn-Depe site develop a proto-urban society. Namazga-Tepe followed suit, but Altyn-Depe was a major centre even by then.

The full-blown BMAC was in place by 2200 BC. Finds of Oxus materials have occurred far and wide, right across Iran, into Elam at the end of the third millennium BC and its southern city of Anshan during the Sukkalmah period. The use of Linear Elamite writing has also been put forward as part of the same wider picture of trade links and interaction.

The BMAC's sphere of influence grew considerably and quickly. By about 2100-2000 BC it was engaged in trade with the cities of the Helmand and Jiroft, the Indus Valley too, and the Marhashi state to the east of Elam. It also provided a vital trading link between the early Indo-Iranians and the high cultures of Mesopotamia and Iran, and served to encourage the Andronovo and Sintashta people to develop their industries.

A small window is opened up into Oxus history, however, as opposed to its archaeology. A silver vessel of unknown provenience which is stylistically ascribed to the court art of the Oxus speaks of an armed conflict between the Oxus polity and the state of Marhashi, the two great regional powers to the east of Elam around 2200-2000 BC.

One or more clashes were likely sparked by attempts to control the local north-south trade routes along which important copper outcrops could be mined. The warriors of Marhashi were defeated, perhaps close to Shahdad within Jiroft territory, and this while Marhashi was strong enough to scare the rulers of Akkad. Elamites such as the sukkalmahs and Simashki sought alliances with the Oxus court in their regional power dance.

This civilisation is also often linked in another way to Indo-Iranians, specifically their migrations of the second millennium BC. The BMAC played what presumably was a largely unwitting role in their later expansion into South Asia and the Near East. For several centuries they generally remained bottled up to the north of the BMAC.

But then the BMAC's decline and fading allowed those Indo-Iranian groups into its cities, while also allowing them to expand far to the south of that to form two major groups: Indo-Iranians across Persia and all points eastwards to Bactria, and the Indo-Aryans who entered India.

The Yaz culture was an early Iron Age representation of the BMAC in its later Indo-Iranian days during the tail end of the Andronovo (about 1500-1100 BC), prior to any concrete penetration of Iran. By about 500 BC much of the territory between the former BMAC and Elam was in Indo-Iranian hands.


Elamites of Din Sharri being deported by Ashurbanipal

Principal author(s): Page created: Page last updated:

(Information by Peter Kessler, with additional information from Encyclopaedia Britannica (Eleventh Edition, Cambridge (England), 1910), from Historical Atlas of the Ancient World, 4,000,000 to 500 BC, John Heywood (Barnes & Noble, 2000), from Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East, Michael Road (Facts on File, 2000), from The Archaeology of Elam, D T Potts (Cambridge University Press, 1999), from The Elamite World, Javier Álvarez-Mon, Gian Pietro Basello, & Yasmina Wick (Eds, Routledge, 2018), from Cultural Relationships Beyond the Iranian Plateau: The Helmand Civilization, Baluchistan and the Indus Valley in the 3rd Millennium BC, E Cortesi, M Tosi, A Lazzari, & M Vidale (CNRS Editions, 2009), and from External Links: Demographic considerations regarding the settlement and necropolis of Shahr-i Sokhta, E Ascalone & P F Fabbri (E Ascalone & S M S Sajjadi (Eds), Excavations and Researches at Shahr-i Sokhta 2, Pishin Pajouh, 2022, pp 523-554, and available via Academia.edu), and The Archaeological Evidence for OIT – I (Brown Pundits).)

c.2200 BC

An indigenous Bronze Age culture emerges in Central Asia between modern Turkmenistan and down towards the Oxus (otherwise known as the Amu Darya), the somewhat nebulous region called Transoxiana.

This is the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex, or 'Oxus Civilisation' in the later provinces of Bactria and Margiana, often abbreviated as BMAC or the Oxus polity.

Gonur Tepe in Margiana
Ancient Merv, the capital of Persian and Greek Merv/Margiana (now in Turkmenistan), was eventually abandoned just like its even more ancient forebear shown here, Gonur Tepe (Gonordepe), which was a major city of the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex until the River Murghab changed its course to leave it high and dry (click or tap on image to view full sized)

Margiana (now largely in Turkmenistan) is the likely heartland of this civilisation as the majority of urban settlements are located there, with apparently later extensions into Bactria and most often only with cemeteries being found by archaeology.

By the time of the BMAC's appearance, the Helmand culture settlement at Shahr-e Sokhta has already been abandoned, around 2350 BC, while its sister city of Mundigak has preceded it around 2400 BC to signal an end to this culture. Its territory borders that of the soon-to-emerge Greater Khorasan civilisation which covers BMAC-like archaeological finds outside of specific BMAC territory.

Indo-European tribes in the form of Indo-Iranians soon integrated themselves into the BMAC, especially along its northern edge. These tribal people are, principally, of the Andronovo horizon in Central Asia.

Map of Elam and the Iranian Plateau
Elamite cities on the plain to the east of Sumer benefited from direct contact, but cities with more easterly locations also swiftly caught up, connected into a network of trading routes which stretched east to the Indus and north to Hissar and the BMAC (click or tap on map to view at an intermediate size)

It may also be elements of the Oxus culture - or Andronovo Indo-Iranians who feed off the BMAC's progressive nature - which form the 'spiral cities' of the Kazakhstan steppe. Items which so far have been recovered from recent exploration in this region include make-up equipment, a chariot, and numerous pieces of pottery.

The artefacts are daubed in swastikas (symbols of the sun and of eternal life). Evidence of ritual horse burials are also found, which ties in with ancient Indo-Aryan texts which describe the animals being sliced up and buried with their masters.

c.2200 - 2100 BC

The spheres of influence of the Marhashi state and the BMAC's Oxus polity seemingly have grown considerably. This eventually affects in depth the geopolitical interactions of the eastern Iranian plateau. A silver vessel of unknown provenience, but stylistically ascribed to the court art of the Oxus, speaks of an armed conflict between these two regional powers.

Proto-Elamite cuneiform found at Jiroft
Proto-Elamite inscriptions from the site at Jiroft (possible capital of Marhashi) have fairly recently been found at the Konar-Sandal subsection of the site, dating to somewhere between 3000-2500 BC

This vessel documents a clash between the Oxus polity and the expansionism of an early Marhashi state, with the latter now becoming powerful enough to represent a threat both to its north-eastern neighbours and to Akkad in the west. Marhashi prisoners become propaganda representations on court art for Akkad and the Oxus polity.

A clash or clashes for control of the local north-south trade routes along which important copper outcrops could be mined, clashes in which warriors from Marhashi are defeated, may take place not far from Shahdad.

It seems that the Simashki rulers may end up seeking alliances with the Oxus polity in order to aid their own resistance to Marhashi dominance. That policy is maintained by their successors, the Eparti kings.

The archaeological site of Shahdad in Iran
Located at the end of a small delta on a dry plain in central-eastern Iran, to the north of Jiroft and Tepe Yahya, Shahdad was excavated by an Iranian team in the 1970s

c.2000 BC

The climate has been changing across the Near East and into southern Central Asia and northern South Asia. The Sumerian civilisation is brought to an end, as is the already-weakened Jiroft culture. From around this time onwards the same changes greatly affect the BMAC, denuding it of water as the rains decline.

The people of the BMAC are gradually forced to migrate away, abandoning many of their cities, just as the people of the Indus Valley civilisation are being forced to do the same thing. The changes may take a century or two to become fully apparent though, and the Oxus polity appears not to be at all weakened at first.

At about the same time the Indo-Iranian Suyargan culture forms, feeding off the BMAC's cultural and technological advances. It centres itself around the Aral Sea, near the Amu Darya delta within what will later be known as Chorasmia as a successor to the Kel'teminar.

Kel'teminar figurines
The sedentary fishermen of the semi-desert and desert areas of the Karakum and Kyzyl Kum deserts and the deltas of the Amu Darya and Zeravshan rivers in ancient Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan formed the region's first Neolithic expression: the Kel'teminar culture

c.1970? BC

With the apparent end of the line of Simashki rulers, their replacements are the stronger Eparti rulers. Under them the Elamites swiftly rise to become a regional power, one which is contemporaneous with the Old Babylonian empire.

They often threaten conquest both against Babylon and the other Amorite city states of Mesopotamia, such as Isin. At the same time their court at Anshan now adopts BMAC-related images, symbols and, presumably, formal Oxus court garments.

Possibly the use of Linear Elamite writing may be part of a wider picture in which Elam enjoys strong relations with the Oxus polity at the expense of Marhashi's waning importance.

1800 - 1700 BC

With the now-clear weakening of the Oxus polity and its fading as a political force, Indo-Iranian groups become dominant across Bactria and Margiana and, over time, some of their descendants enter Iran to found states such as those of the Mannaeans, the Median empire, and early Persia.

River Oxus / Amu Darya
The River Oxus - also known over the course of many centuries as the Amu Darya - was used as a demarcation border throughout history - it was also a hub of activity in prehistoric times, providing a home to the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex, or Oxus Civilisation

Some go even farther and even earlier to form the Mitanni empire. Others cross the rivers of modern Afghanistan and the Hindu Kush mountains and enter India between 1700-1500 BC. They eventually form their own kingdoms there such as Magadha, plus Kalinga, and the Kaurava state.

1700 BC

The last remnants of the BMAC are succeeded and largely absorbed by the Andronovo horizon of Indo-Iranian-speaking tribespeople in the north. Andronovo material culture - and specifically Incised Coarse Ware pottery - is now widely found in former BMAC strongholds.

The Tazabagyab culture has already emerged in the Amu Darya river delta as Andronovo nomads have settled into a life of agriculture following their contact with the BMAC population. Such agricultural and pastoral lifestyles become increasingly dominant.

The Vaksh and Bishkent cultures in the Tajikistan highlands have been formulated on the basis of examinations of kurgan cemeteries which feature pottery. This combines elements both of the late BMAC and Andronovo traditions.

 
Images and text copyright © all contributors mentioned on this page. An original king list page for the History Files.
Please help the History Files