History Files
 

Please donate to help

Contributed: £174

Target: £526

2023
Totals slider
2023

Hosting costs for the History Files website have been increased by an eye-watering 40% in 2025. This non-profit site is only able to keep going with your help. Please make a donation to keep it online. Thank you!

Near East Kingdoms

Early Cultures

 

Jiroft / Halilrud Culture (Bronze Age) (Eastern Iran)
c.4000 / 3000 - 2000 BC

FeatureThe city states of Sumer formed one of the first great civilisations in human history (see feature link). This Near Eastern civilisation emerged a little way ahead of that of Africa's ancient Egypt, and up to a millennium before that of the Indus Valley culture.

Southern Mesopotamia (modern Iraq and the western edge of Iran) was subjected to permanent settlement during the Pottery Neolithic, with a series of city states being formed by the late fourth millennium BC. By this time neighbouring regions were emerging as population centres in their own right. One of those, Elam, was located to the east of Sumer, with its own selection of city states at its core.

This region was located on an alluvial plan below the Zagros mountains, and its remoteness meant that it took some time for it to assimilate Sumer's groundbreaking social, agricultural, and administrative inventions. Culturally, Elamite states achieved less than their more advanced neighbours, and imported much of what they needed.

To the east of Elam was a series of small cities and regional states which emerged about the same time as did Elam. These stretched across the Iranian plateau which reached towards the modern Pakistan border, and northwards into central Iran. They also connected with similar advanced settlements on the southern coast of the Caspian Sea, such as at Tepe Hissar, and others which emerged to the north-east of that, such as those of the Oxus civilisation (or BMAC).

FeatureThe Jiroft culture emerged to the immediate east of Elam, on the Iranian plateau (see feature link for reporting of its initial discovery). Its type site is the archaeological mound at Konar Sandal, with nearby Jiroft-influenced cities including Shahdad and Tepe Yahya. More distant cities such as Shahr-e Sokhta have more recently been classified as part of the Helmand culture.

The Jiroft is also referred to as the Halilrud culture as it flourished in Iran's Kerman and Sistan-Baluchestan provinces, approximately around 3000-2000 BC, centred in the fertile Halil river valley. Such a name for the culture would typically be ideal, but the use of 'Jiroft' had already taken off thanks to blanket coverage in press articles.

While the end date is pretty well set - it is part of a much wider regional decline - the start date is uncertain. Certainly the Jiroft/Halilrud flourished and reached a peak during this period, but the earlier date of 4000 BC has often been proposed as a starter for initial - and very poorly understood - progress towards that peak. The culture did not predate the emergence of Mesopotamian cultural sophistication. Instead it was part of an expanding chain of technological progression.

Some modern experts are reluctant to use the name 'Jiroft' as a cultural distinction. It is a relatively recent discovery, one which took place only following floods in the region in AD 2000, and the majority of 'finds' are in fact looted items which have appeared on the open market and which have mainly been taken from cemeteries within the Konar Sandal region.

Excavations at Konar Sandal were carried out between 2002-2008 by a team which was under the direction of Yousef Majidzadeh. Finds from the south mound included a decorated clay statue relief from the south site, with this area including an upper town which contains a medium-sized mudbrick building. The excavators named this as a citadel. It replaced an earlier administrative building which was demolished and in-filled in preparation for the citadel.

After a sixteen-year hiatus, excavations resumed at Konar Sandal under the leadership of the renowned archaeologist, Seyyed Mansour Seyyed Sajjadi, thanks to persistent efforts by Kerman province's cultural heritage department.

The Konar Sandal type site for the Jiroft culture has also been put forward as the potential capital city of the Marhashi polity of the late third millennium BC. During the twenty-third century BC, Marhashi was a major opponent of the Akkadian empire, and seems to have overrun Elam itself for a time to unite local efforts against the Akkadians.

A series of dark-greenish stone and bronze vessels which have been found through archaeology can be dated at least to the third millennium BC. These chlorite, bronze, and ceramic containers, vases, and other decorative items are covered in mythological scenes which depict snakes, eagles, and scorpions. They also display figures which have human bodies and bulls heads, along with other anthropomorphic figures.

Such vessels were widely distributed, across the Indus Valley to the Persian Gulf, and as far north as the Gonur Tepe site of the BMAC. Metallurgy was another speciality of this Bronze Age culture. Jiroft blacksmiths created bronze out of a type of alloy which can be positioned between copper and arsenic, similar to finds from nearby sites but different from the copper and tin mix which was largely being used elsewhere at this time.

Evidence of this industry has been discovered at Jiroft, but researchers still are not sure exactly how craftsmen would have worked with the toxic arsenic, which produces poisonous fumes when added to melted copper. Other Jiroft materials include bevel-rimmed bowls which typically are characteristic of Uruk, adding evidence to the international trade which passed through the region.


Elamites of Din Sharri being deported by Ashurbanipal

Principal author(s): Page created: Page last updated:

(Information by Peter Kessler, with additional information from Encyclopaedia Britannica (Eleventh Edition, Cambridge (England), 1910), from The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character, Samuel Noah Kramer ('List 1' of Sumerian rulers, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963), from Historical Atlas of the Ancient World, 4,000,000 to 500 BC, John Heywood (Barnes & Noble, 2000), from The Ancient Near East, c.3000-330 BC, Amélie Kuhrt (Routledge, 2000, Vol I & II), from Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East, Michael Road (Facts on File, 2000), from Mesopotamia: Assyrians, Sumerians, Babylonians, Enrico Ascalone (Dictionaries of Civilizations 1, University of California Press, 2007), from The Archaeology of Elam, D T Potts (Cambridge University Press, 1999), from The Elamite World, Javier Álvarez-Mon, Gian Pietro Basello, & Yasmina Wick (Eds, Routledge, 2018), from Prehistoric Settlements in the Bardsir Plain, South-Eastern Iran 1976-1977, S M S Sajjadi (East and West 37, No 1-4, pp 11-130, 1987), and Excavations at Konar Sandal in the Region of Jiroft in the Halil Basin: First Preliminary Report (2002-2008), Y Madjidzadeh & H Pittman (Iran 46, pp 69-103, 2008), from Jiroft: The Earliest Oriental Civilization, Yousef Madjidzadeh (Tehran, 2003), and from External Links: Archaeology.org, and Inscribed objects found at Konar Sandal (Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative), and Konar Sandal archaeological site (Tehran Times), and Who Were the Mysterious People of Ancient Jiroft? Joshua Rapp Learn (Discover Magazine), and Jiroft III: General Survey of Excavations, Oscar White Muscarella (Iranica Online, 2008).)

c.4000 BC

The settlement of Konar Sandal emerges around this point in time as the type site for the Jiroft culture. It only really seems to grow and expand as a city by about 2880 BC, as international trade expands with Mesopotamia. The neighbouring settlement of Shahdad may already have emerged by this date.

Map of the Fertile Crescent of the Neolithic
This map shows the general area of the Fertile Crescent from where - especially along its northern edges - the origins of agricultural farming emerged between about 10,000-6000 BC (click or tap on map to view full sized)

c.3100 - 2700 BC

The Uruk IV influence suddenly fades around 3100 BC (or 3200 BC in some modern sources) for reasons unknown. Older traditions re-emerge in places which had previously taken on board Uruk influences.

The Uruk-inspired centre at Susa in Elam seems to be taken over by immigrants from the Zagros mountains. A new political entity emerges which discards Uruk IV cuneiform and language to replace it with 'Proto-Elamite', a precursor to the usage of all later Elamite city states.

FeatureThe 'Proto-Elamite' period witnesses the development of a semi-pictographic writing system for the east. Susa begins to be influenced by the cultures of the Iranian plateau, with the Jiroft likely being a key factor here (and see feature link), and this system dominates the lowlands to the west of the Zagros mountains.

The burnt city of the Jiroft culture in Iran
The Jiroft civilisation is also referred to as the Halilrud culture, flourishing in Iran's Kerman and Sistan-Baluchestan provinces approximately around 3000-2000 BC and centred in the fertile Halil river valley

But it also cuts off these access points from post-Uruk IV Sumer, enforcing new trading connections which go through Susa itself, and also Anshan far to its south-east. Curiously, and perhaps not coincidentally, it is about this time that the lands of the Elamites and even those to the east of it become more hostile to Sumer's kings.

c.2730s BC

The reign of Enmerkar of the 'First Dynasty' city of Uruk is notable for an expedition against Aratta, a city state which is apparently located far to the north-east of Mesopotamia but which has proven impossible to pinpoint in reality.

Various theories abound, few of which are convincing. General modern opinion favours a location on the Iranian plateau or to its immediate east, in a region which more likely forms part of the Helmand culture and at a location which may be close to Shahr-e Sokhta.

The goddess Inanna resides in Aratta, but Enmerkar apparently pleases her more than does the lord of Aratta who is only named once, and she wishes to move to Uruk. This request provides the excuse for conflict.

Proto-Elamite cuneiform found at Jiroft
Proto-Elamite inscriptions from the site at Jiroft (possible capital of Marhashi) have fairly recently been found at the Konar-Sandal subsection of the site, dating to somewhere between 3000-2500 BC

This king is succeeded by Lugalbanda, one of his military leaders, whose consort is Ninsun. The exploits and conquests of Enmerkar and Lugalbanda form the subject of a cycle of epic tales which constitute the most important source of information on early Sumerian history. Aratta, though, disappears from any historical record.

c.2500 - 2225 BC

At Konar Sandal's southern site the dense urban network and first 'citadel' are abandoned sometime between the twenty-fifth and late twenty-third centuries BC. This is somewhat early to coincide with a general climate and economic downturn in the general area.

However, it could just about coincide with attacks by Eannatum of Lagash and/or Sargon 'the Great' of Akkad, and it certainly coincides with the rise of a Marhashi state which may want to re-imagine it as the state capital. Curiously this is about the same time as the eastern city of Shahr-e Sokhta suffers a decline.

Map of Elam and the Iranian Plateau
Elamite cities on the plain to the east of Sumer benefited from direct contact, but cities with more easterly locations also swiftly caught up, connected into a network of trading routes which stretched east to the Indus and north to Hissar and the BMAC (click or tap on map to view at an intermediate size)

Konar Sandal's citadel is later rebuilt but the urban core may shift further to the north (the 'North Mound'). A lack of archaeological data has so far prevented a fuller picture being built up here in relation to settlement patterns.

c.2300 - 2100 BC

The spheres of influence of the Marhashi state and the BMAC along the Oxus seemingly have grown considerably. This eventually affects in depth the geopolitical interactions of the eastern Iranian plateau. A silver vessel of unknown provenience, but stylistically ascribed to the court art of the Oxus, speaks of an armed conflict between these two regional powers.

This vessel documents a clash between the Oxus polity and the expansionism of an early Marhashi state, with the latter now becoming powerful enough to represent a threat both to its north-eastern neighbours as well as to Akkad in the west. Marhashi prisoners become propaganda representations on court art for Akkad and the Oxus polity.

A clash or clashes may take place not far from Shahdad for control of the local north-south trade routes along which important copper outcrops could be mined, clashes in which warriors from Marhashi are defeated.

River Oxus / Amu Darya
The River Oxus - also known over the course of many centuries as the Amu Darya - was used as a demarcation border throughout history - it was also a hub of activity in prehistoric times, providing a home to the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex, or Oxus civilisation

It seems that the Simashki rulers may end up seeking alliances with the Oxus polity in order to aid their own resistance to Marhashi dominance. That policy is maintained by their successors, the Eparti kings.

c.2004 BC

With the collapse of Sumerian civilisation, record-keeping becomes fragmentary for a period of approximately two centuries. Elam under the Simashki kings serves to fill the power vacuum in the east but details here are generally thin on the ground. The Jiroft culture also vanishes even though Mesopotamia soon restores a level of regional cohesiveness.

 
Images and text copyright © all contributors mentioned on this page. An original king list page for the History Files.
Please help the History Files