History Files
 

Help the History Files

Contributed: £0

Target: £760

2023
Totals slider
2023

The History Files is a non-profit site. It is only able to support such a vast and ever-growing collection of information with your help. Last year's donation plea failed to meet its target so this year your help is needed more than ever. Please make a donation so that the work can continue. Your help is hugely appreciated.

Near East Kingdoms

Ancient Mesopotamia

 

Uruk (Unug / Urak / Erech) & Eanna (City State) (Sumer)

FeatureThe city states of Sumer formed one of the first great civilisations in human history (see feature link). This Near Eastern civilisation emerged a little way ahead of that of Africa's ancient Egypt, and up to a millennium before that of the Indus Valley culture. It developed out of the end of the Pottery Neolithic across the Fertile Crescent, a period which had seen Neolithic Farmer practices spread far and wide across the Near East and beyond.

As irrigation improved so the more southerly reaches of the Euphrates could at last be occupied by humans and their animals. Southern Mesopotamia (modern Iraq and the western edge of Iran) was subjected to permanent settlement, initially in the form of pastoralists but soon as farmers too. Cultures around the edges of this progression included the Hassuna and Samarra which began this settlement process, and perhaps elements of the Hissar culture in the Iranian highlands were also involved.

FeatureBy the late fourth millennium BC, Sumer was divided into approximately a dozen city states which were independent of one another and which used local canals and boundary stones to mark their borders. Many early historical events in the region are found only in the Sumerian king list, which notates the rulers of the city states (and see feature link), but archaeology has also uncovered a wealth of detail.

The city of Uruk was situated to the east of the present course of the Euphrates, in a region of marshes along the line of the ancient Nil Canal. Sometimes labelled the 'mother of all cities', it was one of the oldest and most important cities in Sumer. It led the way in the advance towards the formation of individual city states and was an influential leader during the fourth millennium BC, during the Uruk IV cultural period (around 3900-3100 BC).

Uruk was already a major city by 3300 BC, and it was here that Sumerian civilisation seems to have reached its creative and social peak. Many familiar urban human themes and groupings seem to have emerged during this period. Trade with many regions outside of Mesopotamia was already flourishing by the start of the third millennium BC, notably with the Hatti in Anatolia. But very few cities last forever.

It was in AD 1856 that members of the Royal Asiatic Society were informed of a ruin site which had been found in southern Mesopotamia's remote desert region. The Arabs knew it as Warka, a mangling of the Old Testament's Erech in the 'land of Shinar (Sumer)'. This was the ruins of the ancient city of Uruk (or Unug or Urak in some later records). The visible site was vast even when half-covered by desert sand, with a still-discernable ring of city walls of about nine kilometres in circumference.

Initial archaeological investigations took place between 1850-1856, but discoveries at the time were less exciting than elsewhere. More detailed examinations took place around twentieth century wars, in 1912-1914, 1928-1939, and 1953-1990. German archaeologists especially provided highly-detailed reports.

Kings did not generally appear until the 'Early Dynastic I' period at the start of the third millennium BC. The position generally grew out of senior temple posts, with head priests - the en - coming to command entire cities as those cities grew and needed more centralised leadership. Older leadership posts may have had a basis in pre-city tribal groups, but details have not been preserved. Initially the new city rulers could hold varying titles, with lugal (initially an important figure, or a rich and influential one, but later a king) only eventually emerging as the default.

Meskiaggasher, the first documented king of Uruk, was one of the first documented kings anywhere, and Uruk may even have driven the formation of the concept of kingship outside of tribal groups. He founded his own dynasty in the temple of Eanna (E-anna, or temple of Inanna, the holy sanctuary which is mentioned many times in the Epic of Gilgamesh).

Eanna was the most prominent of archaeological mounds, one which contained a dense sequence of nineteen building levels for the early fifth millennium BC and the fourth millennium BC, plus some later remains from the post-Sumer second millennium BC. These levels revealed a great deal of advancement and improvement, but Eanna only became part of the greater (and expanding) city of Uruk during the reign of Enmerkar in the later twenty-eighth century BC.

As the first king (according to the later Sumerian king list at least), Meskiaggasher dominated a region which extended from the Mediterranean to the Zagros Mountains, to the east of Sumer. His son, the aforementioned Enmerkar, officially gained the kingship after conquering Kish's 'First Dynasty'.

According to the Sumerian king list, a total of twenty-two kings ruled in Uruk for 2,610 + X years, six months and fifteen days, five times (dynasties). Here, List 1 is primarily used, backed up by List 2 and List 3. Note that older dating systems place the earliest reigns at dates which have been shown to be unrealistically early.

The king list presents kingship as a divine gift which had been bestowed upon mankind in primordial times. It was passed down from king to king and from city to city through the will of the gods and could only be held by one person at a time. This now appears to be more of a high kingship, with each city recognising the most powerful king of the period while ruling their own territory. Only later did the concept of empire emerge to remove or minimise local rule under a more powerful empire-builder.

Sumerians

(Information by Peter Kessler, with additional information from Mesopotamia: The Invention of the City, Gwendolyn Leick (Penguin Books, 2001), from Encyclopaedia Britannica (Eleventh Edition, Cambridge (England), 1910), from The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character, Samuel Noah Kramer ('List 1' of Sumerian rulers, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963), from Political Change and Cultural Continuity in Eshnunna from the Ur III to the Old Babylonian Period, Clemens Reichel (List of Eshnunna's rulers, providing some names which are not on the Bruce R Gordon list as part of a dissertation proposal for the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at the University of Chicago, 11 June 1996), from First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, Peter Bellwood (Second Ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2022), from Historical Atlas of the Ancient World, 4,000,000 to 500 BC, John Heywood (Barnes & Noble, 2000), from The Ancient Near East, c.3000-330 BC, Amélie Kuhrt (Routledge, 2000, Vol I & II), from Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East, Michael Road (Facts on File, 2000), from Mesopotamia: Assyrians, Sumerians, Babylonians, Enrico Ascalone (Dictionaries of Civilizations 1, University of California Press, 2007), from The Archaeology of Mesopotamia, S Lloyd (Revised Ed, London, 1984), from Early Mesopotamia: Society and Economy at the Dawn of History, J N Postgate (Routledge, 1994), from The First Empires, J N Postgate (Oxford 1977), from History of the Ancient Near East c.3000-323 BC, Marc van der Mieroop (Blackwell Publishing, 2004, 2007), from Ancient History: A Theory About Ancient Times, L C Gerts (List 4 of Sumerian rulers, Chapter 12: The Sumerian king list, 2002), from Mesopotamia, Chris Scarre (Ed, Past Worlds - The Times Atlas of Archaeology, Guild Publishing, London 1989), from The Age of the God-Kings, Kit van Tulleken (Ed, Time Life Books, Amsterdam 1987), and from External Links: Ancient Worlds, and The Sumerian Kings List, J A Black, G Cunningham, E Fluckiger-Hawker, E Robson, & G Zólyomi ('List 2' of Sumerian rulers, available via the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, Oxford, 1998), and Ancient History, Anthony Michael Love ('List 3' of Sumerian rulers at Sarissa.org), and Images from History (University of Alabama), and Evolution of Sumerian kingship (Ancient World Magazine), and Pennsylvania Sumerian Dictionary Project (Published between 2003-2021, part of the Babylonian section of the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Anthropology and Archaeology), and The Ancient Near East, A Life, Piotr Michalowski & Gary Beckman (Orientalia lovaniensia Analecta 220, 2012, and available to download as a PDF), and the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature.)

c.3900 BC

As early as 8000 BC, during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B, small clay tokens of various distinctive shapes are evidently being used by Near Eastern farmers to keep an inventory of their commodities.

A cone-shaped token, for instance, may indicate that a farmer has a certain amount of barley in his granary. This already-ancient system is greatly expanded during the Uruk IV period which begins around 3900 BC (or 3800 BC according to some).

The ancient Sumerian religious centre of Eridu - already a millennium old - is gradually surpassed in size by the nearby city of Uruk, with the Eanna mound being its oldest and most continuously inhabited part until the third millennium BC. The Kullab mound comes into use during the period as the city's other focus of building works.

Metalwork also appears, marking the beginning of the Chalcolithic (Copper Age) and the fading of the stone age period which had seen Neolithic Farmer practices transform human lives between about 10,000-4000 BC.

The Uruk IV period which lasts between about 3900-3100 BC sees this city flourish as the only real urban centre in Sumer, and one which sits at the heart of a great trading and cultural centre. Building works reach a frenzy of succession and experimentation. New structures are continuously erected, pulled down, and built up again.

Settlements elsewhere are much smaller, such as at Abu Salabikh, and are especially so in the north where Nineveh and Shakhi Kora (the latter almost unknown to history), flourish at a fairly small scale.

c.3100 - 2900 BC

The Uruk IV influence suddenly fades around 3100 BC (or 3200 BC in some modern sources) for reasons unknown. Local traditions re-emerge in places which had previously taken on board Uruk influences, including at Shakhi Kora which is abandoned entirely. Elam's advanced city of Susa experiences an influx of immigrants who introduce great changes there.

The Uruk III or Jemdet Nasr period in Sumer is one of comparative isolation (with the city of Jemdet Nasr supplying the type site). A new social structure is built which will become a fundamental part of the successive 'Early Dynastic' period. A host of early cities are mentioned at this time, on seals which are discovered at Jemdet Nasr itself. These cities include Kesh, Kish, Larsa, Nippur, Ur, Uruk, and Zabalam.

Uruk itself is suddenly rebuilt, with construction taking place in more permanent mudbrick. The city continues to thrive in the Jemdet Nasr period but an entirely new complex of buildings is erected over the carefully-levelled remains of those of the previous period. Sumer remains culturally inward-looking for this period.

Early Bronze Age pottery
This fragment of Early Bronze Age pottery was produced in Mesopotamia around 3000 BC, as the early city-building movement there began to accelerate towards large-scale city states and a recorded history

c.2900 BC

The Jemdet Nasr period fades in favour of a new, outward-looking 'Early Dynastic' period. True writing now blossoms as it moves closer to spoken Sumerian, archives explode with mercantile records and administrative acts, and the first kings begin to appear as leading city figures take on more duties and increasing power, ostensibly as deputies of the gods themselves.

Nippur becomes the focus of Sumer's unified cult practices, in favour of Ur. Positioned centrally in Sumer, perhaps this location is more satisfactory for the region's cities. All of them seem to be joined together when it comes to paying homage to the Sumerian pantheon of gods, headed by Enlil who is Nippur's patron (another good reason for making this city the religious centre).

This unique status lasts until the eighteenth century BC (which witnesses the rise of Babylon). Seals mention it frequently, even when they are found in small or obscure Sumerian cities such as Abu Salabikh, Arina, Kesh, Urum, and Zabalam.

First Dynasty (Uruk / Eanna) (Sumer)
c.2750? - 2550 BC

The leading position which had been held by Uruk in the fourth millennium BC's Uruk IV period began to fade in the early third millennium BC as other Sumerian city states evolved and gained prominence. The city of Kish in the northern part of Sumer became especially important after city states farther down the river had been ravaged by repeated flooding (the likely origin of the division between Antediluvian and 'Post-Diluvian' periods in Sumer's history).

Shortly after the end of the reign of Etana of 'First Dynasty' Kish, Meskiaggasher of Uruk founded a rival 'First Dynasty' in Uruk, far to the south of Kish. His dynasty quickly came to be the dominant force in the region. Its members gradually grew in importance, and increasingly sought luxury materials to express their power. These goods, often from abroad, were acquired either by trade or conquest.

The first dynasty of Uruk is the second set of entries on the Sumerian king list, comprising kings 24-35. Twelve kings ruled for 2,310 / 3,588 years (Lists 1 & 2), although there is a remarkable lack of familial relationship, with various incomers taking turns at ruling the city. The list for this dynasty seems initially to have been drawn up during the 'Ur III' dynasty, a good five hundred years later. After this period the kingship (or, potentially, high kingship) was taken to 'First Dynasty' Ur.

c.2750 BC

FeatureThe 'Post-Diluvian' king list (various versions are available - see feature link) states that: 'after kingship was brought to Eanna [from the "First Dynasty" city of Kish], Meskiaggasher, the son of the sun god, Utu (Shamash), ruled both as en (priest or lord) and lugal (king) for 324 years'.

During this time he enters the sea (the Mediterranean) and climbs the mountains (the Zagros Mountains), ie. he creates an empire, but his earlier dating here destroys any notion that the Sumerian king list is truly linear in terms of its running order.

fl c.2750s BC

Meskiaggasher / Mec-ki-aj-gacer

Of Eanna. Son of Utu. Ruled for 324/325 years.

Meskiaggasher (or Mec-ki-aj-gacer according to 'List 3' - see above) is the first documented king of Uruk, and seemingly one of the first true kings anywhere. He founds his own 'First Dynasty' in the temple of Eanna (E-anna, or temple of Inanna, the holy sanctuary which is mentioned many times in the Epic of Gilgamesh).

His existence has been doubted by some due to the combined Sumerian-Akkadian nature of his name. However, Semitic languages in the region are first attested about 2800 BC, notably at Mari a way to the north. A hybrid name is not impossible even in a ruling figure.

Stone bull, Late Uruk Period
This stone bull dates from the late 'Uruk IV' period in Sumer (southern Mesopotamia), between about 3300-3000 BC, and probably originates from the then-culturally dominant city of Uruk

fl c.2730s BC

Enmerkar

Son. Ruled for 420 years. 'Founded' the greater city of Uruk.

Enmerkar's reign is notable for an expedition against Aratta, a city state which is apparently located far to the north-east of Mesopotamia but which has proven impossible to pinpoint in reality. Various theories abound, few of which are convincing.

This king is succeeded by Lugalbanda, one of his military leaders, whose consort is Ninsun. The exploits and conquests of Enmerkar and Lugalbanda form the subject of a cycle of epic tales which constitute the most important source of information on early Sumerian history.

fl c.2710s BC

Lugalbanda

Unrelated military commander. Ruled 1,200 years. The 'Shepherd'.

c.2700 BC

Following Lugalbanda's reign, military domination of Sumer passes back to Kish, although the Sumerian king list still has Uruk as possessor of the official kingship. Possibly Kish initially defers to Uruk's originally-greater sense of authority and prestige.

fl c.2700s BC

Dumuzi / Dumuzid

Unrelated. Ruled for 100/110 years. Captured by Kish.

Dumuzi (or Dimuzid according to 'List 3' - see above) is 'the fisherman' who comes from the city of Kuara (Kua), a smaller city which is located close to Eridu. He is not to be confused with another Dumizi who is placed in Bad-tabira.

According to a potentially later addition to the king list details, he is captured by Enmebaraggesi of Kish, and presumably towards the beginning of the latter's late-twenty-seventh century BC dominance.

fl c.2690s BC

Gilgamesh / Gilgamec / Gilgameš

 Son of Lugalbanda. Ruled for 126 years.

FeatureArguably the most famous of all Sumerian kings, according to the king list Gilgamesh is the son of a nomad. Traditionally, he is responsible for building the massive walls surrounding Uruk and is recorded in the Epic of Gilgamesh (see feature link).

Gilgamesh's legendary exploits are narrated in five surviving Sumerian poems, the earliest most likely being 'Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld'. Enkidu is Gilgamesh's friend and comrade in war, initially a wild, hairy man who wanders the steppe but who later becomes civilised.

The important Eanna temple which is mentioned here is levelled at some point in the early part of this millennium, with its remains being close to the surface for modern archaeologists to examine. Although it is perhaps the oldest part of the city, the rise of kings may have made it obsolete.

fl c.2680s BC

Urnungal / Ur-Nungal

Son. Ruled for 30 years.

fl c.2660s BC

Udulkalamma / Udul-kalama

Son? Not always claimed as such. Ruled for 15 years.

fl c.2640s BC

Labasher / La-ba'cum / La-ba'shum

Ruled for 9 years.

fl c.2630s BC

Ennundaranna / En-nun-tarah-ana

Ruled for 8 years.

fl c.2600s BC

Meshede / Mec-he / Mesh-he

Ruled for 36 years. The 'Smith'.

fl c.2590s BC

Melamanna / Melem-ana / Til-kug

Ruled for 6/900 years.

fl c.2550s BC

Lugalkidul / Lugal-kitun

Ruled for 36/420 years.

These kings are all relatively obscure, with the last of them being Lugalkidul. Unless he literally takes the title of lugal into his name, he should more realistically be shown as Kidul or Kitun.

Little is known of the later kings of the first dynasty (and sometimes nothing other than a name and a reignal length), but Lugalkidul would appear to be the last ruler of his dynasty, with the (high) kingship subsequently being removed from Uruk.

c.2550 BC

The Sumerian king list of the 'Post-Diluvian' period now states that: 'all told, twelve kings ruled for a total of 2,310 years in Eanna [the important former temple region of Uruk] before Uruk was defeated in battle and its kingship carried off to Ur' [under Mesannepadda].

Second Dynasty (Uruk) (Sumer)
c.2440 - 2420 BC

According to the Sumerian king list of the 'Post-Diluvian' period, twelve of Uruk's "First Dynasty" kings ruled for a total of 2,310 years in Eanna [the important former temple region within Uruk] before the city was defeated in battle and its kingship carried off to Ur'. This is the seventh set of entries on the king list, one which comprises kings 52-54. Three kings ruled for 187 years.

Uruk seems to have remained docile and obedient for the century after it apparently lost the kingship, possibly without its own independent ruler, or perhaps with a series of little-known rulers (shown below) who have been connected with the city in this period. Ur was eventually defeated in battle, around 2450 BC, and its kingship was carried off to Awan, the major Elamite city in the highlands to the east of Sumer.

While it seems that Uruk was briefly dominated by Lagash after this, around the 2440s BC, it eventually recovered enough to take the kingship from Hamazi which itself had taken it from Kish after that city had defeated Awan. Uruk's 'Second Dynasty' however, was fleeting in terms of its longevity.

 

c.2530s BC

Several kings have been added as city rulers thanks to finds of tablets and seals, none of whom are on the king list. Uruk has a sequence of them now. Details are extremely brief, and the line of succession is more presumed than confirmed.

fl c.2520s? BC

Lumma

Not on the king list. Succeeded by Ursangpae?

fl c.2510s? BC

Ursangpae

Not on the king list. Succeeded by Lugalnamniršumma?

c.2500 BC

Mesannepadda of Ur begins that city's first ruling dynasty around this time, the 'First Dynasty'. It is also this dynasty of kings which coincides with the laying of the 'Royal Graves' of Ur, although none of the archaeological remains can be linked to any specific ruler. Mesannepadda himself is known to bear the additional, honourary title of 'king of Kish'.

fl c.2494 - 2455 BC

Lugalnamniršumma

Not on the king list. Succeeded by Lugalsilâsi?

c.2455 BC

Ush is the ruler of Umma, twenty-nine kilometres away from Lagash. He holds the title ensi, or governor. This title is not unusual for a Sumerian king as he will see himself as being the city's governor on behalf of its god, in this case Shara.

Although the records come from his principal rival, Lagash, he is accused of acting arrogantly when he rips up the stele of Mesalim to claim the fields of Gu'edena (largely a territorial dispute about crops and water).

fl c.2455 - 2440 BC

Lugalsilâsi I

Not on the king list. Here, or in Ur circa 2610s BC?

fl c.2440s BC

Urzage

Not on the king list. Succeeded by Enshakushanna?

c.2440s BC

Eannatum of Lagash annexes virtually all of 'Post-Diluvian' Sumer, including Kish, Nippur, Uruk (briefly), Ur, and Larsa, and reduces his arch-rivals at Umma to a tributary state with the defeat of Enakalle. In addition, he extends his realm to parts of Elam and along the Persian Gulf, apparently using terror as a matter of policy.

The stele of the vultures describes the violent treatment which is meted out to his enemies. Urur of Akshak leads a northern coalition against him but that is destroyed, with Akshak and Mari both recognising Lagash's supremacy. Lagash is later eclipsed by Umma under Lugalzaggesi.

c.2430 BC

FeatureThe Sumerian king list (various versions are available - see feature link) now states that: 'After kingship was brought to Hamazi, Hadanish ruled for 360 years before Hamazi was defeated and its kingship carried off to Uruk [of the "Second Dynasty"]'.

fl c.2440/2430 BC

? / En-cakanca-ana / Enshakushanna

Ensi. Ruled 60 years. Briefly vassal to Eannatum of Lagash.

Under Enshakushanna, Uruk conquers Agade, Hamazi, Kish, and Nippur to claim hegemony over all of Sumer. He also throws the Elamites out of Awan. He is the first ruler known to take the Sumerian title en ki-en-gi ki-uri, or 'lord of Sumer and Akkad'.

Such a usage would suggest, though, that Agade, or at least the embryonic state of Akkad around it, is already great, on a par with Sumer itself, which seems unreasonable at this time. Despite his own conquests Enshakushanna is also briefly subject to the overlordship of Eannatum of Lagash.

fl c.2430 BC

Lugalure / Lugal-kinice-dudu

Son. Ruled for 120 years.

c.2430 BC

Lugalure of Uruk (otherwise translated as Lugal-kinice-dudu, or Lugal-kinishe-dudu, or even Lugalkiginneš-dudu) helps Lagash to defeat his arch-rivals at Umma after the latter launch an attack on Lagash. Umma is reduced to a tributary state with the defeat of its ruler, Enakalle.

As a way of resolving the ongoing conflict there, Eannatum of Lagash extends the channel of the Inun Canal into the Gu'edena, dividing the fields in two and giving one side of the division to Umma. At the canal he inscribes the stele of the vultures to mark the event, and he also restores the stele of Mesalim. The conflict continues, however, and is recorded in detail.

Bad-tibira foundation peg
This terracotta foundation peg of Entemena of Lagash is dated between 2404-2375 BC, and mentions a treaty with the king of Uruk

c.2405 - 2375 BC

As the last great ensi of Lagash, Entemena is dominant across many cities in Sumer during his reign. Numerous clay nails from Bad-tibira record that he builds a temple for Inanna and Lugal-emuš, and 'at that time Entemena, ensi of Lagaš, and Lugal-kinice-dudu, ensi of Uruk, established brotherhood'.

Entemena undertakes temple construction at Girsu, cancelling Lagash's debts as the mother city to Girsu. In relation to the construction of the Emuš temple at Bad-tibira, he cancels debts for the citizens of Bad-tibira, Larsa, and Uruk in the earliest attested case of a ruler cancelling the debts of his subjects. This becomes the norm in the Old Babylonian period.

fl c.2370s? BC

Argandea / Lugalkisalsi / Lugaltarsi

Son. Ruled for 7 years.

As with Lugalure before him, the name Lugalkisalsi or Lugaltarsi appears to combine the title of lugal with a personal name, in this case Kisalsi or Tarsi. This is not uncommon with the kings of Sumer's city states.

He could also be the otherwise uncertain Lugalsilâsi II, while the name Argandea is sometimes shown as a separate individual of an uncertain date around the late 2300s BC.

c.2350 BC

Now the Sumerian king list of the 'Post-Diluvian' period states that: 'After kingship was brought to Uruk, Enshakanshanna ruled for 60 years; Lugalure ruled for 120 years, and all told, three kings ruled for a total of 187 years before Uruk was defeated and its kingship carried off to Ur'.

fl c.2360s? BC

Lubarasi

Son. Not on the king list. Rule uncertain.

fl c.2350s? BC

Silim-Utu

Son. Not on the king list. Rule uncertain.

The son of Lugalkisalsi / Lugaltarsi is Lubarasi, whose own son is Silim-Utu. Neither are certain as rulers, although the length of time between the reign of Lugalure and that of Lugalzaggesi of the sole 'Third Dynasty' king would allow it.

Third Dynasty (Uruk) (Sumer)
c.2355 - 2330 BC

The city of Uruk appears to have remained a leading city for a large chunk of the second half of the twenty-fifth century BC. Then, under the priest-king Lugalzaggesi, Umma overthrew Lagash's domination, captured Uruk, displaced Kish as the dominant power, and claimed an empire which extended from the Mediterranean to the Persian Gulf.

This is the fourteenth entry on the Sumerian king list, one which comprises king 81. That one king ruled for 25 / 34 years (Lists 1 & 2). Some versions of the list combine Uruk's brief 'Third Dynasty' and its 'Fourth Dynasty' as a larger third dynasty of Uruk, something which also affects the numbering for the 'Fifth Dynasty'.

The king list of the 'Post-Diluvian' period states for the now-ended 'Second Dynasty' that: 'After kingship was brought to Uruk, Enshakanshanna ruled for 60 years; Lugalure ruled for 120 years, and all told, three kings ruled for a total of 187 years before Uruk was defeated and its kingship carried off to Ur'.

c.2355 BC

FeatureThe Sumerian king list (various versions are available - see feature link) now states that: 'After kingship was brought back to Kish... seven kings ruled for 491 years before Kish was defeated [for the final time] and its kingship carried off to Uruk [of the "Third Dynasty"]', and possibly later than the actual start of the period in which Lugalzaggesi controls the city.

fl c.2355 - 2330 BC

Lugalzaggesi / Lugal-zage-si

King of Umma. Ruled for 25/34 years.

Lugalzaggesi of Umma is the last ethnically-Sumerian ruler of Uruk. His reign coincides with the burning of Shuruppak, although there is no suggestion that he is the cause.

His reign also coincides with that of Alusarsid of Agade, who seemingly begins to build an empire around his city state. Around 2330 BC, Lugalzaggesi is defeated and captured by Alusarsid's successor, Sargon of the now-expansive Akkadian empire. Sargon claims his territory and the kingship.

c.2330 BC

Now the Sumerian king list of the 'Post-Diluvian' period states that: 'After kingship was brought back to Uruk, Lugalzaggesi [of Umma] ruled for 25 years before Uruk was defeated and its kingship carried off to Agade [of the Akkadian empire]'.

Fourth Dynasty (Uruk) (Sumer)
c. 2254/2223? - 2193 BC

According to the Sumerian list, the 'Fourth Dynasty' of Uruk's kings saw to the final defeat of Agade and claimed the kingship, or overlordship, of Sumer. In fact, it is possible that Uruk's kings here were instead contemporaries of the later kings of Agade, holding some degree of dominance in southern Mesopotamia.

The starting date of circa 2254 BC for this dynasty was calculated by counting back from the point at which the Gutians invaded Sumer, and using the List 2 lengths of reign. It is perhaps only coincidental that this was the very same year in which it is thought Naram-Sin came to power in Agade, a king who faced serious revolts from the start of his reign. Fourth dynasty Uruk was a key player in those revolts, leading a coalition of southern Sumerian cities under Amar-girid.

This is the sixteenth set of entries on the Sumerian king list, one which comprises kings 93-97. Five kings ruled for a total of thirty years (List 1), or five kings ruled for 30 / 43 / 26 years, or three kings ruled for 47 years (List 2).

 

fl c.2270s? BC

Girimesi (?)

Vassal of Agade? Not on the king list.

fl c.2254? BC

Amar-girid (?)

Vassal of Agade. Not on the king list.

c.2254? BC

Uruk leads a revolt against the Akkadian empire, rallying the southern Sumerian cities of Adab, Isin, Lagash, Nippur, Shuruppak, Umma, and Ur. The combined cities place a well-organised army in the field which is then defeated. This conflicts with a similar revolt under Kish, but is probably a combination of two or more major rebellions in this period.

c.2254? BC

FeatureThe Sumerian king list (various versions are available - see feature link) now states that: 'Dudu [of Agade] took control and ruled for twenty-one years and Shudurul... ruled for fifteen years [nine].

'All told, eleven kings ruled for a total of one hundred and ninety-seven years before Agade was defeated and its kingship carried off to ["Fourth Dynasty"] Uruk'.

The dating does not support such a continuation, with Uruk's kings seemingly ruling contemporaneously with their Akkadian counterparts. That, however, does not rule out a shift in power from one to the other city.

c.2264 - 2249? BC

Urnigin / Ur-nijin

Son of Ur-Nigar. Ensi. Replaced Amar-girid? Ruled 7/3/15/30 years.

c.2249 - 2243 BC

Urgigir / Ur-gigir

Son. Ensi. Ruled for 6/7/15 years.

c.2243 - 2237 BC

Kudda / Kuda

King. Ruled for 6 years. May have governed other cities.

c.2237 - 2217 BC

Puzur-ili

King. Ruled for 5/20 years. May have governed other cities.

c.2217 - 2193 BC

Ur-Utu (or Lugal-melem) / Ur-babbar

King. Ruled for 6/25 years. Defeated by Gutians.

c.2193 BC

Uruk is struck and defeated by the Gutians at the same time as they destroy Agade and carry off the kingship. It is from this point that the Gutian kings are recorded in more detail as Mesopotamia apparently undergoes a gradual climate-induced collapse which also affects Egypt, Anatolia (in city states which include Hatti), and Syria (such as in Tuba), as well as other locations around the world.

Zagros Mountains
The Zagros Mountain range provided the Gutians with their home, from their assumed arrival in the region around the period between 2450-2350 BC onwards, as it did the later Medes and Persians

c.2193 BC

Now the Sumerian king list of the 'Post-Diluvian' period states that: 'After kingship was brought back to Uruk, Urnigin ruled for seven years; Urgigir, son of Urnigin, ruled for six years; Kudda ruled for six years; Puzur-ili ruled for five years, and Ur-Utu ruled for six years. All told, five kings ruled for a total of thirty years before Uruk was smitten by the Gutian Hordes and its kingship carried off by them'.

Fifth Dynasty (Uruk) (Sumer)
c.2120 - 2113 BC

The Gutian invasion and poorly-managed occupation of areas of central Mesopotamia during the twenty-second century BC seems to have terminated kingship in Uruk. If anyone other than an appointed governor was in place then archaeologists have not (to date) managed to find a single clay tablet or inscription for such a king.

A surviving clay tablet which contains much of the Sumerian king list was dated by its scribe to the reign of King Utukhegal of Erech (Uruk), which places it around 2125 BC. Uruk was responsible for driving out the Gutians, or at least leading regional efforts to do so. It was also prominent in Sumerian struggles against the Elamites up to 2004 BC, during in which it suffered severely.

This is the eighteenth entry on the king list, one which comprises king 119. That one king ruled Uruk's 'Fifth Dynasty' for seven years, six months, and fifteen days (List 1), or one king ruled for 427 years and an unknown number of days, or seven years, six months, and fifteen days, or seven years, six months, and five days (List 2), or one king ruled for 27 years (List 4).

c.2120 BC

FeatureThe Sumerian king list (various versions are available - see feature link) now states that: 'After the Gutian Hordes seized kingship, everyone was his own king for three years [there was no cohesive regional control]... [and then] twenty-one kings ruled for ninety-one years and forty days before the Gutian Hordes were defeated and kingship carried back to Uruk [of the "Fifth Dynasty"]'.

Having claimed the kingship (or high kingship) of Sumer through his military success, Utuhegal of Uruk becomes something of a hero figure to his fellow Sumerians. He also appears to govern for a time from Lagash.

c.2120 - 2113 BC

Utuhegal / Utu-hejal / Utukhegal

Ruled for 7 years, 6 mths, 15 days, or 427 years, or 27 years.

c.2120 BC

Utuhengal appears to be a rare native Sumerian ruler following the Akkadian empire period and the Gutian phase in southern Mesopotamia. His inscriptions make it clear that he is the king (and only king) of Uruk's 'Fifth Dynasty'.

He may gain the position after helping to throw out the Gutians and elevating himself from a vassal governor of Uruk. His eventual death is due to an accident while investigating a dam, after which he is succeeded by his son-in-law, Ur-Nammu of Ur.

c.2112 BC

Now the Sumerian king list of the 'Post-Diluvian' period states that: 'After kingship was brought back to ["Fifth Dynasty"] Uruk, Utuhegal ruled for seven years, six months, and fifteen days before Uruk was defeated [Utuhegal died] and its kingship carried off to Ur [of the "Third Dynasty"]'.

Sumerian administrative tablet
This Sumerian administrative tablet shows five commodities which, to date, have not been identified, revealing the fact that Sumerian cuneiform scripts have not yet been absolutely and fully translated

c.2004 BC

The waning Sumerian civilisation which has at its centre the city of Ur now collapses entirely when the Shimashki king of Elam, Kindattu, together with the people of Susa, sacks the city and captures Ibbi-Sin of Ur.

Uruk is briefly occupied by the invading Elamites before becoming a possession of Isin. In fact, Isin now enjoys a period of dominance in Sumer while an Amorite-dominated Ur re-emerges in a reduced state and Amorite Uruk is a controlled city.

Uruk (Amorite City State) (Southern Mesopotamia)

The city of Uruk had been one of the first great cities in Sumer, and across Mesopotamia as a whole (klargely covered by today's Iraq and southern Turkey. It seems to have been singly responsible for the Uruk IV period in the fourth millennium BC, and was a major Sumerian city throughout the third millennium BC.

Civilisation in Sumer waned towards the end of that millennium, seemingly due to the Euphrates undergoing a major shift in course, but also to a degree of aridisation and climate dryness which was being felt around the world.

Sumer and the now-dominant city of Ur collapsed entirely when the Shimashki king of Elam, Kindattu, together with the people of Susa, sacked Ur and captured its king around 2004 BC. Uruk was briefly occupied by the invading Elamites before becoming a possession of Isin.

In fact, Isin now enjoyed a period of dominance in Sumer while Amorite-dominated Ur re-emerged in a reduced state. Amorites had been inhabitants of Sumer for some centuries, and it was they who rose to fill the gap which was left by the end of Sumerian civilisation. Uruk remained controlled by Isin for approximately one hundred and thirty-three years before that city state's decline allowed it to break away under its own independent dynasty of Amorite kings.

Under Sin-Kashid, Uruk saw the renovation and reconstruction of the temples of Ishtar/Inanna, which had fallen into disrepair in the previous century, and the building of one of the largest Old Babylonian period palaces. It also appears to have become a centre of trade, as shown by inscriptions which give the (ideal) prices of goods in the region. The city became prosperous, although it apparently remained politically insignificant.

The chronology here does not entirely match up with that of Babylon under the most recent attempts to juggle often minimalist mentions of events. The Rimanum who rules here from about 1810 BC is now usually classed as a contemporary of Babylon's Samsu-Iluna (circa 1750-1712 BC). The details are so vague however, that Rimanum's few known battles still work when they are seen as an effort to repulse Rim-Sin of Larsa.

Mesopotamia

c.1865 BC

Sin-Kashid (or Sinkashid) breaks free from the control of a declining Isin and founds his own dynasty in Uruk, which is the final period of independence for the city.

Without naming a pedigree to establish his fitness to rule, he calls himself 'King of Uruk, king of the Amnanum', which is the name of his tribe of Yaminite Amorites who had probably settled in the area during the 'Third Dynasty' of Ur.

c.1865 - 1833 BC

Sin-Kashid / Sîn-kāšid

Married daughter to king of Babylon to establish close ties.

c.1835 BC

Silli-Adad of Larsa is defeated and killed in battle by Sabium of Babylon, apparently leaving the kingdom in a political vacuum which is quickly filled by Elamites.

c.1833 - 1827 BC

Siniribam / Sin-eribam

Son, with an Akkadian name.

c.1827 - 1824 BC

Singamil / Sîn-gāmil

Son, with an Akkadian name. Not the ruler of Diniktum.

Records regarding Uruk become very sparse from this point under its series of Amorite kings who seem to achieve very little in a period in which Mesopotamia is still recovering from the collapse of Sumer. Singamil is succeeded by his brother, Ilumgamil, rather than his son, Salim-palih-Marduk.

c.1824 - ? BC

Ilumgamil / Ilum-gāmil

Brother, with an Akkadian name.

c.1822 BC

Larsa's Rim-Sin enjoys the longest reign of any king in ancient Mesopotamian history, totalling sixty years. At the start of his reign his family control a stretch of southern Mesopotamia which reaches from Nippur and Mashkan-shapir in the north to the head of the Persian Gulf in the south, including Larsa and Ur.

Eteja / Etēia

Relationship unknown. Last of his dynasty.

Anam / Dingir-Am / Digiram

Founded a new dynasty. Adopted a Sumerian name.

 

Anam or An-am, son of Dingiram, is known as the 'Shepherd of Uruk' or the 'Army Chief of Uruk', suggesting a good deal of positive governance and military success. He rebuilds Uruk's city walls, and also restores the temples of An and Inanna, 'the ancient work of divine Ur-Nammu and Shulgi' of the 'Third Dynasty' city of Ur.

Unlike the preceding Amorite kings with their Akkadian names, Anam has an adopted or pseudo-Sumerian name. However, he also reminds Sin-muballit, ruler (or soon to be) of Babylon, that they are 'of one house', reminding him that they are both Amorites of the Yaminite tribe of Amnanum.

c.1816 - 1810 BC

Irdanene / Urdunene / IR-ne-ne

Son. Sumerian name. Captured in battle.

c.1810 BC

There is a claim in a letter that Rim-Sin of Larsa ejects Irdanene and captures Uruk at this time. The claim is somewhat suspect, possibly being a later invention to justify Rim-Sin's confirmed capture of Uruk around 1803/1802 BC. Possibly, though, Rim-Sin is able to influence the governance of Uruk to the extent that Rimamun is a relation or a pick of his.

c.1810 - ? BC

Rimanum / Rîm-Anum

Vassal or relation of Rim-Sin of Larsa? Reigned 18 mths/4 years?

c.1810 - 1800 BC

Rim-Sin of Larsa is aggressively expanding his empire and, following the fall of Isin, Uruk is a prime target. It remains unmolested while Larsa appears to be comparatively weakened, but is seemingly a ringleader in opposition activities until it leaves the loose coalition.

Year 2 of the reign of Rimanum is noted for a gathering around Uruk of the armies of the land of Emut-balum (Larsa), together with those of former rivals, Eshnunna, Isin, and Kazallu (the latter shown as a fragment of the name in the inscription in question).

The best interpretation (as examined by Michalowski and Beckman) suggests that these armies approach Uruk while claiming to be allies. Their approach stirs up an enormous dust cloud. When it settles, Rimanum is able to defeat them. His victory is short-lived as Uruk's walls are destroyed the following year.

? - 1803/2 BC

Nabi'ilisu / Nabi-ilishu

The last king of the dynasty.

c.1803/2 BC

Rim-Sin of Larsa captures the city. It appears that Sin-Kashid's palace and the surrounding district are plundered and burned to the ground, after which time nothing is built in the area. The dynasty also appears to end, perhaps due to Rim-Sin's activities. Control of Yaminite Amnanum appears to devolve to Bahlukulim of Tuttul.

Uruk Trough
The Uruk trough belongs to the late prehistoric period, about 3300-3000 BC, but as it was probably a cult object in Inanna (Ishtar), it may have remained in use for quite some time

c.1787 BC

Still under the control of Larsa, Uruk is attacked and defeated by Hammurabi's growing Babylonian empire,

c.1763 BC

Hammurabi of Babylon attacks and defeats the Amorite city state of Larsa for its failure to provide any real assistance in the allied effort to beat back the growing threat of the powerful Elamites.

The victory gives him control of the entire lower Mesopotamian plain, which includes Isin, Nippur, Ur, and Uruk. The Elamites become vassals of Babylonia, as does Ekallatum, while Dilmun remains an important trading centre.

c.1741 - 1736 BC

Many city states have been revolting against Babylonian rule since the death of Hammurabi, and many free themselves from the empire, despite hard fighting by Hammurabi's son, Samsu-Illuna. Terqa is attacked, and Apum is sacked (1726 BC), but Rim-Sin II of Larsa now revolts against Babylon's rule, aided by Anni of Eshnunna.

The loss of Babylonian controls is not only political. Previously-flourishing cities such as Nippur and Ur are now mainly abandoned. The priesthood at Uruk migrates to northern Babylonian cities which continue to thrive.

The reasons are obscure, possibly with Babylon's response to revolts being severe enough to destroy the local infrastructure. An alternative is that Hammurabi's system of economically-interdependent districts has collapsed, crashing the economy of the entire region. Occupation at Uruk now remains minor and fragmentary.

AD 224

Following the Sassanid victory over the Parthians at the Battle of Hormozdgān, the Sassanids have become the great power in Persian lands. Ardašīr of Margiana now submits to Ardašīr I.

The former city of Uruk now ends its days as a military outpost of the Sassanids, guarding part of the western border against Roman incursions. Much of its former infrastructure is already half-covered in desert sands, with the rest eventually to follow, although major monuments still stand out.

 
Images and text copyright © all contributors mentioned on this page. An original king list page for the History Files.