|
|
City State of Kish / Kic
The founders of Kish (modern Tall al-Uhaymir, 80km south of Baghdad) were
Sumerians: non-Semitic black-haired people of an unknown origin. Their occupation
of the site at Kish began in the Jemdet Nasr Period (3200-2900 BC),
but this was ended by the archaeologically-attested flood of between 2900-2800BC in Sumer,
which left
deposits in Kish. However, it is possible that the city was less badly affected than
Shuruppak, as Kish quickly assumed the kingship.
It flourished in the full blooming of Sumerian civilization in
the Early Dynastic Period. The city was of major importance in the early
third millennium BC (the Early Dynastic II Period of the twenty-sixth
century BC), but it declined in importance later, remaining in
occupation until the
Sassanian period.
Certainly in later times, and quite possible from the very earliest times,
whichever king controlled the city of Kish was recognised as šar kiššati
(king of Kish), and was considered pre-eminent in Sumer,
possibly because this was where the two rivers approached, and whoever
controlled Kish ultimately controlled the irrigation systems of the other
cities downstream. Many rulers from other cities who achieved dominance in
Sumer also claimed the title for themselves.
The First Dynasty kings of Kish are also known as the First Kingship
(of Sumer, after the flood). According to the Sumerian king list, a total of 39 kings ruled for 14,409
+ X years, three months and three and-a-half days, four times (dynasties) in Kish.
Here, "List 1" is
primarily used, backed up by "List 2"
and "List 3" (see
Sumer for details). |
|
|
|
|
FIRST DYNASTY
c.2900? - 2650? BC
This is the first set of entries on the
Sumerian list comprising kings
1-23. Twenty-three kings ruled for 24,510 years, three months, and 3.5 days.
The earliest names are semi-legendary, but were probably based on real
ante-diluvian rulers. About half of them have Semitic names, meaning that
Semites were at least established in the northern part of Mesopotamia by
this ancient date and that not all interaction between the two groups was
hostile. |
fl c.2900 BC |
Gaur /
Jucur / (Jushur) |
Ruled for 1,200 years.
(From the WB-62 list.) |
|
Gulla-Nidaba-annapad / Kullassina-bel |
Ruled for 960/900
years. |
|
Palakinatim /
Nanjiclicma |
Ruled for 900/670? years. |
|
Nangishlishma /
En-tarah-ana |
Ruled for ?/420 years,
3 mths, 3.5 days. |
|
Bahina /
Babum |
Ruled for ?/300 years. |
|
Buanum /
Puannum |
Ruled for 840/240
years. |
|
Kalibum |
Ruled for 960/900
years. |
|
Galumum /
Kalumum |
Ruled for 840/900
years. |
|
Zukakip /
Zuqaqip |
Ruled for 900/600
years. |
|
Atab / Aba |
Ruled for 600 years. |
|
Mashda /
Macda |
Son. Ruled for 840/720
years. |
fl c.2750 BC |
Arurim /
Arwium / Arpu-Rim |
Son. Ruled for 720 years. |
|
c.2750 BC |
The Sumerian king list and excavations in Iraq show evidence of a flood at
Shuruppak
somewhere between 2900-2750 BC, which extends as far as Kish, whose
king, Etana, supposedly founds the first Sumerian dynasty after the flood:
"after the Flood, the kingship was handed down from Heaven a second time,
this time to the city of Kish which became the seat of kingship." |
fl c.2750 BC |
Etana |
Ruled for 1,560/1,500/635
years. "The Herdsman." |
|
The king list names Etana as "the shepherd who ascended to Heaven and made
firm all the lands." In other words, he stabilises the lands, bringing some semblance of peace and control to them
after the Flood phase. He is also the first
king of Sumer to be known from any other source but the list. Shortly after his
reign ends, Meskiaggasher founds a rival dynasty at
Erech (Uruk), far to the south of Kish,
which dominates Sumer. |
|
Balih |
Son. Ruled for 400/410
years. |
|
Enmenunna /
En-me-nuna |
Ruled for 660/621
years. |
|
Melam-Kish /
Melem-Kic |
Son. Ruled for 900 years. |
|
Barsalnunna /
Barsal-nuna |
Brother. Ruled for 1,200 years. |
|
Meszamug /
Zamug |
Son. Ruled for 140 years. |
|
Tizkar /
Tizqar |
Son. Ruled for 305 years. |
|
Ilku |
Ruled for 900 years. |
? - c.2615 BC |
Iltasadum |
Ruled for 1,200 years. |
c.2615 - 2585 BC |
Enmebaraggesi / En-men-barage-si |
Ruled for 900 years. |
|
According to the king list, Kish subdues the
Elamites
("Enmebaraggesi, the king who smote the Land of Elam"), although it is not a
historically provable event. Enmebaraggesi also becomes the dominant ruler
in Sumer, in place of
Uruk, and constructs
the Temple of Enlil at Nippur.
He is the earliest king whose existence has been archaeologically confirmed. |
fl c.2585 BC |
Agga /
Aga |
Son. Ruled for 625 years.
Last ruler of the Etana dynasty. |
|
Again, according to the king list, Kish is defeated in battle and its
kingship is carried off to Eanna, which later becomes part of the city of
Uruk (which
had already happened in c.2750, with the possibility that there had been
something of a rivalry for supremacy between these two cities). Agga is tied
in with Gilgamesh, so it is possible that the date for him here is too late
by about sixty years. |
|
|
|
|
SECOND DYNASTY
c.2550/2500 - 2430 BC
According to the king list, Kish defeated the Elamite kings of
Awan
to regain the kingship. The first king of this dynasty, Mesilim, is
strangely absent from the king list, despite clearly having been a figure of
authority in the region. There is a theory that he and Mesannepadda of
Ur might be one
and the same person, which would explain the omission, but not the
subsequent division of Ur and Kish following his reign.
This is the fifth set of entries on the
Sumerian list comprising kings
43-50. Eight kings ruled for 3,195 / 3,792
years (Lists 1 & 2). |
c.2550 BC |
Mesilim |
Not on the king
lists. |
|
Mesilim of Kish does not appear on the king list, but his existence is
confirmed from predynastic
Lagash and from Adab. He is famous for drawing the border between
Umma and Lagash, a
contentious point between these two cities. His decision, accepted by both
parties, appears to favour Lagash over Umma. |
c.2500 BC |
(Name unknown) /
Susuda |
Ruled for 201 years. |
|
Dadasig |
Ruled for ?/81/1,1310 years. |
|
Mamagal /
Magalgal / Mamagalla |
Ruled for 420/360 years. |
|
Kalbum /
Kaalbum / Galbum |
Son. Ruled for 132/195 years. |
|
Tuge / Tuge-E |
Ruled for 360/300 years. |
|
Mennumna /
Men-nuna |
Ruled for 180 years. |
fl c.2450 BC |
Enbi-Ishtar |
Not on Lists 1-4. |
|
Lugalmu /
(Name unknown) / Ibbiea |
Ruled for 420/290 years.
Different lists swap the last two kings. |
|
Ibbi-Ea /
Lugalju / Lugalmu |
Ruled for 290/360/420 years. |
|
c.2430 BC |
Then Kish is defeated, perhaps by Enshakushanna of
Uruk or
Eannatum of
Lagash, and the kingship taken to
Hamazi. |
|
|
|
|
THIRD DYNASTY
c.2400 BC
Kish defeated the kings of
Mari to claim supremacy.
An inn keeper before claiming the throne,
Ku-Bau was, "she who made firm the foundations of Kish [and] ruled for a
hundred years as 'king'." She was the only known queen to rule in Sumerian history.
This is the eleventh entry on the
Sumerian list comprising king
66. One king ruled for 100 years. |
fl c.2400 BC |
Ku-Bau /
Kug-Bau / Ku-Baba |
Ruled for 100 years.
The "Innkeeper." |
|
Then Kish is defeated and the kingship is
carried to Akshak. |
|
|
|
|
FOURTH DYNASTY
c.2360 - 2340 BC
Following a brief period at the north-eastern city
state of
Akshak, Kish reclaimed
the kingship.
This is the thirteenth set of entries on the
Sumerian list
comprising kings 73-80. Seven kings ruled for 491 /
485 years (Lists 1 & 2), or eight kings
ruled for 586 years (List 2). |
c.2360 - 2340 BC |
Puzur-Sin /
Puzur-Suen / Puzursin |
Son of Ku-Bau. Ruled for 25 years. |
c.2340 BC |
Ur-Zababa /
Urilbaba |
Son. Ruled for 400/6/4+x years. |
|
Ur-Zababa has an Akkadian cupbearer and gardener in his service who bears
the name Sargon. Sargon displaces the king and enters upon a career of
conquest from Akkad. All of
the remaining kings of this dynasty appear to be vassals of Sargon. |
|
Simudarra /
Zimudar / Ziju-iake |
Ruled for 30 years. |
|
Usiwater /
Uß³i-watar |
Son. Ruled for 7/6 years. |
|
Ishtar-muti /
Ectar-muti |
Ruled for 11/17? years. |
|
Ishme-Shamash /
Icme-Camac |
Ruled for 11 years. |
|
(No data) /
Cu-ilicu / (No data) |
Ruled for 15 years. |
|
Nannia /
Nanniya / Zimudar |
Ruled for 7/3 years.
The "Stoneworker." |
|
c.2340 BC |
Kish is defeated for the last time and the kingship passes to Unug (Uruk). |
|
|
|
fl c.2254? BC |
Iphur-Kish |
Vassal of
Agade. Not on the king
list. |
|
c.2254? BC |
Kish leads a revolt against the
Akkadian Empire, rallying the northern Sumerian cities of
Kutha, Tiwa,
Sippar,
Kazallu,
Kiritab, Apiak, Eresh, Dilbat, and
Borsippa, placing
a well-organised army in the field which is then defeated. |
|
|
|
|
c.2004 BC |
With the fall of Sumer,
Kish becomes an Amorite
city state. |
|
|
|
|
AMORITE RULERS OF KISH
The
Amorites had been inhabitants of Sumer for some centuries, and rose to
fill the gap left by the end of Sumerian civilisation.
Kish itself enjoyed mixed fortunes, falling under the control of regional
powers, and only briefly enjoyed true independence.
|
|
c.2004 BC |
Much of Sumer is under the control of the Elamites,
until they are pushed out six years later by
Isin. Kish in the north
then falls under the control of
Kazallu. |
|
c.1897 BC |
Upon the death of the king of
Kazallu, Kish frees itself. |
|
c.1897 - 1888 BC |
Iawium / Yawium |
Freed Kish from
the rule of Kazallu. |
|
c.1888 - 1883? BC |
Manana |
A foreign
conqueror who seized Kish. |
|
c.1883 - 1847 BC |
After Manana had driven off the first king of the newly founded
Babylonian kingdom to
Der,
Kish is sacked by Sabium, Babylon's second king. |
|
c.1732 - 1460 BC |
Kish is taken by the
Sealand kings. |
|
c.1460 BC |
With the fall of the
Sealand kings, Kish becomes the property of
Babylonia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|