|
|
 Elam / Haltamtu / Susiana
Elam was one of the longest-surviving kingdoms in history in one of the oldest civilised areas in the world. It was founded
by circa
2700 BC and was situated in south-western Iran, on the east bank of the
Tigris from modern
Kuwait along the coast of the Persian Gulf (approximately the modern region of Khuzestan and Ilam Province, which
inherits the former kingdom's name). Culturally, the
kingdom achieved less than its advanced neighbours, and imported
much of what it needed, including writing from
Sumer and architecture from
the later
Babylon.
From the few surviving records, it seems the Elamite language bore no
relation to any others; Semitic, Sumerian or
Indo-European, forming part of
a group called Elamo-Dravidian which reached into
India. Elamite records
are also extremely sparse in recording local events, and large areas of
their history are almost totally unknown except through Sumerian records. The form of
the kingdom's name, 'Elam' ('highland'), is Akkadian (and through them, Hebrew), while in the original Elamite form it
was Haltamtu or Haltamti. It was also known in classical writings as Susiana,
from the city state which usually formed its capital. The kingdom's four major cities were Awan,
Anshan, Simash and Susa, the capital, 100 km (75 miles) east of the
Tigris, in which the rulers practised
kingship by matrilineal descent, being referred to as 'son of a sister'. |
from 7000 BC |
The
first traces of civilisation appear in the Elamite region. Susa shows traces
of early settlement. |
|
|
|
c.4000 BC |
Susa
emerges as an important regional centre. |
|
|
|
c.3200 - 2700 BC |
The
Proto-Elamite Period witnesses the
development of a semi-pictographic writing system. Susa begins to be
influenced by the cultures of the Iranian Plateau to the east, and dominates
the lowlands to the west of the Zagros Mountains. Approximately
400 kms to the south, Anshan, in the modern province of Fars, becomes
prominent and expands in size, dominating the highlands of the southern
mountain range. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Elamite Period
The Old Elamite Period marks the beginnings of the
historical era in Elam and relations with the flourishing
Sumerian city states.
Three dynasties of kings ruled, with the last of them forming a short-lived
empire. It seems that at various times, Anshan and Susa were ruled as
separate kingdoms, and were perhaps only briefly united within one state.
However, Sumerian writings start referring to them as the land of Elam,
suggesting an element of unity, perhaps as a loose coalition of city states. |
c.2600 BC |
According to the Sumerian king list, the ruler of the city state of
Kish subdues Elam. |
|
|
|
|
Avan / Awan Kings
The founding of the Awan dynasty of Elamite rulers
ended the hazy Proto-Elamite Period, although precise details of their rule
are extremely fragmentary. Awan was one of Elam's four major cities, located
to the immediate north-west of Susa, and the first three kings are mentioned
on the Sumerian king list,
in the fourth set of post-diluvian entries. The first foreign rulers of
Sumer, they
briefly held dominance there, having gained the kingship from
Lagash or more
probably Umma (although these
cities are missing from the list, and the dating is misaligned).
According to the king list, a total of three
kings of Awan ruled Sumer for 356 years, once (one dynasty) in Awan. This is the fourth
set of entries on the list comprising kings 40-42, but the text was
destroyed in this section. Here, List 1 is primarily used, backed up by List 2
(see Sumer for
details). |
c.2550 - ? BC |
(Name Unknown) |
Ruled for ? years,
holding dominance in
Sumer. |
|
(Name Unknown) |
Ruled for ? years,
holding dominance in
Sumer. |
|
(Name Unknown) |
Ruled for ?/36
years, holding dominance in
Sumer. |
|
Awan is defeated and the
Sumerian kingship passes to
Kish. It
could be possible that the following three kings are the same as the three
unnamed kings who had dominated
Sumer. Their dates are much
closer to fitting in with those in which the kings of Awan could have seized
power from
Lagash or Umma
and ruled for about forty years. |
fl c.2450 BC |
Peli |
|
|
Some lists place three kings of Ebla after Peli as Awan kings. However, the
names seem to be Syrian ones: Igrish-Halam, Irkab-Damu, and Ar-Ennum. |
c.2450 BC |
Eannatum of Lagash
extends his power to parts of Elam and the Persian Gulf, and the succeeding
rulers of Lagash engage in contests against Elam for the next century or so. |
c.2430 BC |
Enshakushanna of
Uruk throws the Elamites out of Awan. |
|
Tata / Taar / Tari
|
|
|
Ukku-Takhesh
|
|
|
Khishur / Hishur
|
|
|
Shushun-Tarana
|
|
|
Napil-Khush
|
|
|
Kikku-Sive-Temti
|
|
fl c.2350/2325 BC |
Lukh-Ishshan
|
|
c.2350 BC |
Elam is
reputedly conquered by Alusarsid of
Akkad. At the same time a
kingdom or confederation known as
Marhashi is emerging to the east, on the
Iranian Plateau. |
fl c.2320 BC |
Khishep-Ratep / Hishep-rasher |
Vassal of
Akkad? |
|
Eshpum
|
Ruled? Vassal of
Akkad? |
|
Ilishmani
|
Ruled? Vassal of
Akkad? |
|
Epirmupi
|
Ruled? Vassal of
Akkad? |
c.2300 - 2280 BC |
Khelu / Helu
|
Vassal of
Akkad? |
c.2280 - 2250 BC |
Khita / Hita
|
Vassal of
Akkad? |
c.2278 - 2270 BC |
After
an attempted rebellion, Elam is re-conquered by Rimush of
Akkad, and real Elamite
history can be traced from this point. The state of
Marhashi is now a
cohesive entity, bordering Anshan to the east. |
|
Shimpishuk
|
Ruled? Vassal
king? |
|
c.2240? BC |
Both Marhashi and
Kutik-Inshushinnak declares independence from
Akkad (although perhaps not
immediately as it seems they are re-conquered for a time), eventually throwing off
Akkadian language influences. The ruler conquers Susa and Anshan, forming a
centralised and unified
kingdom. |
c.2240 - 2220 BC |
Kutik (or Puzur)-Inshushinnak
|
Governor and
general of Susa & king of Awan. |
|
Tazitta I
|
|
|
c.2210 BC |
Marhashi overruns Elam for a
time, and unites eastern efforts in fighting against the
Akkadian
empire. A battle is fought near
Akshak,
at the confluence of the Diyala and Tigris rivers between the two states.
|
|
c.2193 BC |
Elam is overthrown by the
Gutians as they sweep through southern
Mesopotamia
from the Zagros Highlands, also destroying the
Akkadian empire.
The new Simash dynasty eventually comes to power during a period of instability. |
|
Eparti
|
|
fl before 2120 BC |
Tazitta II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simash Kings
Although records are characteristically sparse, it
seems that the invading
Gutians caused the downfall of the former ruling
dynasty in Elam, and their replacements, the Shimashki, faced a period of alternate
diplomacy and attack from the Gutians and
Sumerians. Some names may not be
in the same order on all lists. |
|
|
? |
|
|
|
? |
|
|
c.2050 BC |
Elam loses its capital at Susa when it is conquered by Shulgi of
Ur. |
fl c.2030? BC |
Gir-Namme |
|
fl c.2010? BC |
Enpi-Luhhan |
|
fl c.2007? BC |
Khutran-Temtt |
|
fl c.2004 BC |
Kindattu |
|
|
c.2004 BC |
Kindattu, together with the people of Susa, sacks
Ur and lead its king
into captivity. ending the third dynasty. With this threat removed, Elam
becomes a powerful kingdom, although it is pushed out of southern
Mesopotamia six years later by the
Amorite city state of
Isin. However, Elam appears
to hold on to Kish.
|
|
Indattu-Inshushinnak I |
|
|
Tan-Rukhurater |
|
|
Indattu-Inshushinnak II |
|
|
Indattu-Napir |
|
|
Indattu-Tempt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eparti Kings
Under the stronger Eparti kings the Elamites swiftly rose to
become a regional power, being contemporaneous with the
Old Babylonian empire,
and threatening it and the other
Amorite city states, such as
Isin,
with conquest.
The Eparti were also called 'of the sukkalmahs' due to the title which their
kings bore. In some lists the Eparti are included as
Simash/Shimashki kings. Details on
rulers is extremely sparse, and some names may not even be in the correct
order. |
c.1970 BC |
Eparti I |
|
|
Eparti II |
|
|
fl bef. c.1850 BC |
Eparti III |
|
|
c.1835 BC |
Kudur-mabug |
King of an Elamite state north of Susa? In Zagros Mountains? |
c.1835 BC |
Kudur-mabug, apparent king of an otherwise unknown Elamite state to the
north, manages to install his son, Warad-Sin, on the throne of
Larsa. |
|
Shilkhakha |
|
fl after c.1830BC |
Attakhushu |
|
|
Tetep-mada? |
|
fl c.1792 BC |
Sirukdukh |
|
c.1772 - 1763 BC |
Shimut-Wartash |
|
c.1770? - 1765 BC |
Elam apparently takes control of the city of
Apum after the fall of the
kingdom of Upper
Mesopotamia. Elamite rule is eventually thrown out when the city of
Andarig takes control there. |
c.1763 BC |
Following an attempted invasion the previous year (during which
Ekallatum is conquered
by Elam), the Elamites are defeated in southern
Mesopotamia by Hammurabi's
Babylonian empire, and the kingdom begins a period of vassalage to
Babylon, still with their own kings, although the region's previous
political unity is probably shattered. |
c.1763 - 1745 BC |
Siwe-Palar-Khuppak |
For a time the
most powerful ruler in the area. |
c.1750 BC |
Kudur Lagamar |
King Chedorlaomer of the Bible, but existence is unconfirmed. |
c.1745 - 1730 BC |
Kuduzulush I |
|
c.1732 BC |
Elam loses control of
Kish to the kings of
Sealand. |
c.1730 - 1700 BC |
Kutir-Nahhunte I |
|
c.1700 - 1698 BC |
Lila-Ir-Tash |
|
c.1698 - 1690 BC |
Temti-Agun I |
|
c.1690 - 1655 BC |
Tan-Uli |
|
c.1655 - 1650 BC |
Temti-Khalki |
|
c.1650 - 1635 BC |
Kuk-Nashur II |
|
c.1635 - 1625 BC |
Kutir-Shilkhakha I |
|
c.1625 - 1605 BC |
Temti-Raptash |
|
c.1605 - 1600 BC |
Kuduzulush II |
|
c.1600 - 1580 BC |
Tata |
|
c.1595 BC |
It
appears that at the same time as they take control in
Babylon, the
Kassites are able to devastate Elam. |
c.1580 - 1570 BC |
Atta-Merra-Khalki |
|
c.1570 - 1545 BC |
Pala-Ishshan |
|
c.1545 - 1520 BC |
Kuk-Kirwash |
|
c.1520 - 1505 BC |
Kuk-Nahhunte |
Plundered the
temples of Amorite
Akkad. |
c.1505 - ? BC |
Kutir-Nahhunte II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Elamite Period
The Middle Period began as a poorly recorded period
thanks to the Kassite rule of
Babylonia,
but this was followed by a slow ascendancy into an empire under three
dynasties of kings from the city of Anshan. Although Elam was a late arrival
on the international scene, and had limited influence outside Babylonia and
Assyria,
it cannot be ignored as a significant force. The lack of international
correspondence relating to it probably comes from its rise after the period
of the
Egyptian Armana archive and its distance from
Syria. To date any of these rulers, we
have to rely upon events which are noted in Babylonia. |
|
|
|
|
Kidinuid Kings
The Anshanites dynasties began with the Susa-based Kidinuids, who
oversaw the 'Elamisation' of Susa, while continuing to use the Akkadian
language on their inscriptions. The kings of this period were titled 'king
of Anshan and Susa', indicating a renewed political unity within Elam, or at
least a claim to it. This is the most obscure of the three Middle Period
dynasties. |
c.1500 - ? BC |
Kidinu |
|
|
Inshushinak-sunkir-nappipir |
Some lists place
him last. |
|
Tan-Ruhurater II |
|
|
Shalla |
|
? c.1400 BC |
Tepti-ahar |
|
|
The
best-attested act of this period is Tepti-ahar's building of a new
settlement, called Kabnak (modern Haft tepe), approximately 20km from Susa.
These kings leave no mark outside of the western lowlands. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Igehalkid Kings
Ige-Halki ruled a newly independent, and certainly
reunified, Elam, with the lowlands of Susa in the west once more united with
the highlands of Anshan in the east. Elamite language continued to increase
in importance during this period. However, under the
rule of the Igehalkids the kingdom seems to have remained fairly inactive.
Ten
rulers are known, but there may be more.
The succession of kings was unusual for the period in that the throne moved
back and forth between the descendants of two sons of Ige-Halki. |
c.1350 - 1330 BC |
Ige-Halki |
Or from c.1400
BC. |
c.1330 - 1310 BC |
Pakhir-Ishshan |
Son. |
c.1320 BC |
Elam
is temporarily occupied by the
Kassites. |
c.1310 - 1300 BC |
Attar-Kittakh |
Brother. |
c.1300 - 1275 BC |
Khuman-Numena |
Son. |
c.1275 - 1240 BC |
Untash-Naprisha |
Son. |
|
The
largest project undertaken by the dynasty is the construction of a new city
40km from Susa. The city of Al-Untash-Naprisha is named after its founder,
and is devoted to Napirisha, the great god of Elam, and Inshushinak, the
patron deity of Susa. After the king's death, his city assumed secondary
status to Susa. |
c.1240 - ? BC |
Unpatar-Naprisha |
Descendant of Pakhir-Ishshan. |
|
Kiddin-Khutran I |
Brother. |
|
Kiddin-Khutran II |
Descendant of Attar-Kittakh. |
|
? - c.1220 BC |
Napirisha-Untash |
Son. |
c.1220 - 1200 BC |
Kiddin-Khutran III |
Son? |
c.1230 BC |
Kiddin-Khutran
enters
Babylonia twice to attack
Assyria's
puppet rulers there. On the first campaign,
Nippur is taken, while on
the second Isin is attacked.
When Kiddin-Khutran dies there is a change of dynasty in Elam. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutrukid Kings
It is not known how this new dynasty came to replace
the previous one. Under the Shutrukids the kingdom again became a
powerful force within
Mesopotamia, even being able to reach out and conquer
Babylon. Unfortunately, that expansion brought about the destruction of Elam
and four hundred years of direct
Babylonian rule.
Dates are extremely uncertain, and do not entirely align with events in
Babylonia. |
c.1210 - 1190 BC |
Khallutush-In-Shushinak |
|
c.1190 - 1160 BC |
Shutruk-Nahhunte I |
Rebuilt the
kingdom. |
c.1158 - 1155 BC |
Once
again a rising power, Shutruk-Nahhunte marries the eldest daughter of the
Babylonian king Melishipak,
and appears to claim Babylonia as his own. He is able to push the Kassites out,
forming a short-lived empire that encompasses
Mesopotamia, with his eldest
son on the Babylonian throne. |
c.1160 - 1155 BC |
Kutir-Nahhunte III |
Son. King of
Babylon (1158-1155). |
c.1155 - 1125 BC |
Shilkhak-In-Shushinak |
Brother. |
|
c.1155 - 1135 BC |
While
his brother is later accused by Babylonian sources of having plundered the
country, Shilkhak-In-Shushinak claims to raid Babylonia and
Assyria
repeatedly, and to control the area east of the Tigris as far north as
Nuzi, until
being expelled by the new Isin kings of
Babylonia. |
c.1125 - 1115 BC |
Khutelutush-In-Shushinak |
Result of
probable relationship between his father & sister. |
c. 1115 - ? BC |
Shilhana-Hamru-Lagamar |
Brother. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neo-Elamite Period
The Middle Period ended with the sacking of Elam and
further occupation by
Babylonia.
Elam never quite recovered from this and the neo-Elamite Period was one of Iranian
and Syrian influence, and especially
Assyrian, and
obscurity for the Elamites themselves. |
c.1120 - 760 BC |
Neo-Elamite Period I sees
Elam's capital, Susa, sacked by the
Babylonian king,
Nebuchadrezzar. The kingdom is badly damaged, and is absorbed
into Babylonia. |
c.760 - 644 BC |
Neo-Elamite Period II sees Elam, under its
Babylonian
masters, controlling the
Persians to the east of Elam
itself, who had begun to migrate into the area from around 1000 BC. Elam and
Babylonia often fight side by side against external threats, especially that
of the Assyrians. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Late Elam / Susiana
A new Elamite state emerged from the centuries of
Babylonian
rule, but it was not the powerful state of old. Records of the Elamite
rulers of this period are very poor, with only five kings recorded from
native sources, while sources from
Mesopotamia record fifteen. However,
although the country was politically unstable and was under constant
threat of attack by
Assyria, the Elamites
still retained control of the
Persians to their south, whom
they heavily influenced culturally. They also occasionally threatened
Assyria, and managed to acquire wealth that made Elam the envy of its
neighbours.
Elam probably only controlled the plain of Khuzestan on
the western flank of the Zagros Mountains. The highlands of Anshan were home
to the Persians, and groups that had only recently entered the area
inhabited the Zagros Mountains further north. These formed various states
that were at first very loose coalitions of peoples, with names known to us
only from Assyrian sources. These mention the
Medes, Mannaeans, Persians, and
others, originally with large numbers of kings, later as consolidated
states. All of them contributed towards a more uncertain political sphere to
the east of Mesopotamia. |
c.760 - 742 BC |
Khumbantahrah |
|
742 - 717 BC |
Khumbanigash I / Humban-nikash |
|
|
720 BC |
Assyrian king
Sargon attempts to attack Elam but is
defeated by the Elamites and
Babylonians near
Der.
|
717 - 699 BC |
Shuttir-Nakhkhunte / Shutruk-Nahhunte II |
Murdered by his
brother. |
699 - 693 BC |
Khallushu |
Brother.
Assassinated. |
694 BC |
Khallushu captures
Babylonia
and the king. |
693 - 692 BC |
Kutir-Nakhkhunte |
Seized the
throne. Abdicated in favour of his replacement. |
692 - 689 BC |
Khumma-Menanu / Humban-nimena |
|
|
691 BC |
The king leads a coalition of Iranian states against
Assyrian king
Sennacherib at Halule on the Tigris. The outcome is not decisive, and
doesn't prevent Sennacherib from devastating
Babylon, but it does protect
Elam.
|
689 - 681 BC |
Khumma-Khaldash I |
|
681 - 676 BC |
Khumma-Khaldash II |
|
680 - 653 BC |
Shilhak-In-Shushinak |
Joint ruler
(680-676 BC). |
676 - 664 BC |
|
Urtaku |
Joint ruler. |
664 - 653 BC |
|
Tempti-Khumma-In-Shushinak |
Joint ruler.
Killed in battle. |
|
653 BC |
Ashurbanipal of
Assyria invades
Elam and fights a battle at the River Ulai, which runs near Susa. During the
battle the king, Tempti-Khumma-In-Shushinak, is killed and decapitated.
|
653 - 648 BC |
Atta-Khumma-In-Shushinak |
|
653 - 651 BC |
|
Khumbanigash II |
Joint ruler. |
651 - 649 BC |
|
Tammaritu |
Joint ruler. |
649 - 647 BC |
Indabigash |
Joint ruler
(649-648 BC). |
647 - 644 BC |
Khumma-Khaldash III |
|
644 BC |
Neo-Elamite Period III begins as Elam is devastated by
Assyria,
although not as badly as was previously believed from inscriptions left by
the Assyrians themselves. The populace suffers greatly, but they are not massacred.
Instead, the fragmented and weakened Elamites rule an increasingly shrinking
domain which eventually passes into the hands of the
Persians. They gain Anzan even
while the last seventh century Elamite kings are still claiming it within
their title. |
644 - ? BC |
Shuttir-Nakhkhunte |
Son. 'King of
Anzan and of Susa'. |
|
Khallutush-In-Shushinak |
'King of Anzan
and of Susa'. |
|
Atta-Khumma-In-Shushinak |
'King of Anzan
and of Susa'. |
c.580 BC |
Shuttir-Nakhkhunte |
Son of Indada. Petty king. |
|
Khumma-Menanu |
'King'. |
|
Shilhak-In-Shushinak II |
'King'. |
? - 539 BC |
Tempti-Khumma-In-Shushinak |
Had no title at
all. |
539 BC |
The
Persians assume
control of Elam as part of their increasing dominance of the region, leading
to the Elamites disappearing from history as a recognisable people and
culture. The Persians preserve Elamite culture for at least the period of
their first dynasty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greek Satraps of Susiana
Between 334-330 BC,
Alexander the Great's
Greek empire defeated the
Persians and took control of Elam
(Susiana). As elsewhere in the captured empire, Alexander retained most of the
previous system of administration, and this included the use of satraps to
govern the regions. Upon Alexander's death in 323 BC, control was maintained
under the regency for a time, but the Diadochi Wars between Alexander's
generals ended that arrangement.
|
323 - 320 BC |
Following the death of Alexander the Great,
Susiana is presumably governed by Archon, who holds
Babylonia in the name of the
titular successors to the empire. |
323 - 320 BC |
Archon |
Greek satrap. |
320 - 316 BC |
Antigenes |
Greek satrap. Gained Susiana after First War of the Diadochi. |
316 BC |
Antigenes
is killed by Antigonus of
Greater Phrygia.
Susiana is subsequently drawn into Antigonus' empire until his death. |
301 BC |
Following the death of Antigonus, the territory falls to the
Seleucid empire. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|